Another U.S. court rules against auto industry
Attorney Blogs
Another federal court has ruled against the auto industry in its attempt to block regulation of greenhouse gas pollution from cars.
The ruling today from U.S. District Judge Anthony Ishii in California supports a September decision by a federal judge in Vermont.
Both courts upheld the rights of states to use the federal Clean Air Act to control greenhouse gases from cars.
Steven Hinchman is a lawyer for the Conservation Law Foundation, which intervened in the Vermont case.
Hinchman points out that both the California and Vermont cases followed a U.S. Supreme Court decision in April that affirmed the government's power to regulate global warming pollution.
This is strike three for the automakers. They've now lost in this year alone three different federal cases trying to block regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles. When the best scientists in the whole world are saying this is an urgent crisis, and when the governments are responding, it's time for the automakers to quit litigating and start innovating and producing clean cars.
More than a dozen states have followed California's lead and have adopted tough new emissions standards.
Both Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell and Governor Jim Douglas praised the ruling.
They said the California decision upholds the right of states to require aggressive pollution control measures for vehicles.
Related listings
-
Florida Lawmakers Sue Dean, DNC
Attorney Blogs 10/04/2007[##_1L|1054328138.jpg|width="120" height="118" alt=""|_##]A federal lawsuit to be filed tomorrow by Florida lawmakers against Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean alleges that Dean and the national party are violating the equal protection provisions...
-
Too-close-to-call cases at Supreme Court
Attorney Blogs 10/01/2007[##_1L|1395673476.jpg|width="131" height="91" alt=""|_##]It is called the Supreme Court, but this year in key cases the institution might just as well be called the supreme realm of Justice Anthony Kennedy. Such is the power of the centrist swing vot...
-
Google Defends the DoubleClick Deal
Attorney Blogs 09/30/2007Google is watching you. But you already knew that. Every time you conduct a search using its search engine, Google keeps tabs—and uses the information to send you ads tailored to the interests and tastes suggested by your searches. Here's something y...
Illinois Work Injury Lawyers – Krol, Bongiorno & Given, LTD.
Accidents in the workplace are often caused by unsafe work conditions arising from ignoring safety rules, overlooking maintenance or other negligence of those in management. While we are one of the largest firms in Illinois dedicated solely to the representation of injured workers, we pride ourselves on the personal, one-on-one approach we deliver to each client.
Work accidents can cause serious injuries and sometimes permanent damage. Some extremely serious work injuries can permanently hinder a person’s ability to get around and continue their daily duties. Factors that affect one’s quality of life such as place of work, relationships with friends and family, and social standing can all be taken away quickly by a work injury. Although, you may not be able to recover all of your losses, you may be entitled to compensation as a result of your work injury. Krol, Bongiorno & Given, LTD. provides informed advocacy in all kinds of workers’ compensation claims, including:
• Injuries to the back and neck, including severe spinal cord injuries
• Serious head injuries
• Heart problems resulting from workplace activities
• Injuries to the knees, elbows, shoulders and other joints
• Injuries caused by repetitive movements
For Illinois Workers’ Compensation claims, you will ALWAYS cheat yourself if you do not hire an experienced attorney. When you hire Krol, Bongiorno & Given, Ltd, you will have someone to guide you through the process, and when it is time to settle, we will add value to your case IN EXCESS of our fee. In the last few years, employers and insurance carriers have sought to advance the argument that when you settle a case without an attorney, your already low settlement should be further reduced by 20% so that you do not get a “windfall.” Representing yourself in Illinois is a lose-lose proposition.