Two convicted of fraud in bankruptcy of cheese maker

Bankruptcy

[##_1L|1310657151.jpg|width="130" height="90" alt=""|_##]Two top executives for a now-defunct cheese maker were convicted on all charges they faced in connection with a scheme that used nearly $400 million in fictitious sales to boost Suprema Specialties' stock price.

A federal jury on Monday convicted Mark Cocchiola and Steven Venechanos on 38 counts that included conspiracy, bank fraud, securities fraud, mail and wire fraud.

Cocchiola founded of the Paterson-based company; Venechanos was its chief financial officer and corporate secretary.

"These were corrupt businessmen," U.S. Attorney Christopher J. Christie said in a statement. "They bankrupted a company that was in reality a myth built on phony sales. They were driven by unbridled greed without a thought to the investors they charmed with their illusion of Suprema's success."

Cocchiola, 51, of Englewood Cliffs, and Venechanos, 48, of New Milford, could face dozens of years in prison and millions of dollars in fines when sentenced July 10 by U.S. District Judge Stanley R. Chesler. The heaviest penalties are for the 17 bank fraud charges, each of which carries up to 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine.

Cocchiola and Venechanos were indicted in July 2005. They were convicted following an eight-week trial in which the jury deliberated eight days.

The former controller of Suprema, along with a former manager and four former customers, pleaded guilty to charges including securities fraud and food adulteration charges.

Suprema was liquidated after filing for bankruptcy protection in March 2002.

Prosecutors said that Suprema used the illusion of its growth to conduct a series of secondary stock offerings, netting Suprema millions from investors. Meanwhile, Cocchiola got over $2.5 million, and Venechanos over $1 million, from selling their holdings.

Prosecutors also said that in the second half of 2001, nearly 20 percent of Suprema's reported inventory was imitation cheese that had been relabeled as higher-priced real cheese.

Related listings

  • Court revives Sarah Palin’s libel lawsuit against The New York Times

    Court revives Sarah Palin’s libel lawsuit against The New York Times

    Bankruptcy 08/26/2024

    A federal appeals court revived Sarah Palin’s libel case against The New York Times on Wednesday, citing errors by a lower court judge, particularly his decision to dismiss the lawsuit while a jury was deliberating.The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of...

  • Court orders new hearing for Adnan Syed in ‘Serial’ murder case

    Court orders new hearing for Adnan Syed in ‘Serial’ murder case

    Bankruptcy 08/21/2024

    A 2022 court hearing that freed Adnan Syed from prison violated the legal rights of the victim’s family and must be redone, Maryland’s Supreme Court ruled Friday, marking the latest development in the ongoing legal saga that gained global...

  • Korean Air Pilot Jobs - Korean Air's competitive pay awaits you

    Korean Air Pilot Jobs - Korean Air's competitive pay awaits you

    Bankruptcy 05/10/2024

    Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas told attendees at a judicial conference Friday that he and his wife have faced “nastiness” and “lies” over the last several years and decried Washington, D.C., as a “hideous place.&r...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

New York & New Jersey Family Law Matters We represent our clients in all types of proceedings that include termination of parental rights. >> read