Ex-Lawyer: Toyota Willfully Deceptive
Business Law
Toyota's public relations nightmare appears far from over.
The beleaguered automaker is facing renewed allegations that it systematically withheld information and ignored safety issues that could have prevented fatal accidents.
Dmitrios Biller, a former Toyota lawyer who handled product liability lawsuits, said in multiple media interviews that the automaker willfully tried to suppress evidence of defects.
"Toyota is a very secretive corporation," Biller told the L.A. Times. "It doesn't believe anybody outside the corporation deserves to know what is going on inside, even if it kills somebody."
"You have to understand that Toyota in Japan does not have any respect for our legal system. They did not have any respect for our laws."
Related listings
-
SEC alleges fraud by Austin investment firm
Business Law 12/30/2009An Austin businessman and two of his companies are accused in an alleged scam using former NFL players to attract investors.The Securities and Exchange Commission on Tuesday filed securities fraud charges in federal court in Austin naming Kurt B. Bar...
-
Prosecutors: LA man cheated investors out of $10M
Business Law 12/15/2009A Los Angeles man has pleaded not guilty to running a Ponzi scheme that cheated about 50 investors in a NASCAR merchandise wholesale business out of at least $10 million.Federal prosecutors say 63-year-old Eliott Dresher was arraigned and ordered hel...
-
Court rejects new appeal of Chrysler sale
Business Law 12/14/2009The Supreme Court has declined to take another look at Chrysler's bankruptcy.The justices on Monday turned down an appeal from the state of Indiana pension funds that earlier challenged the automaker's bankruptcy proceedings. The bulk of Chrysler LLC...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.