Federman & Sherwood Files Securities Class Action

Class Action News

[##_1L|1146049967.jpg|width="120" height="138" alt=""|_##]Thursday after the bell, Federman & Sherwood announced that On June 1, 2007, a class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada against Shuffle Master Inc. The complaint alleged violations of federal securities laws, including allegations of issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market which had the effect of artificially inflating the market price. The class period is from December 22, 2006 through March 12, 2007. SHFL closed Thursday's regular trading session at $17.51, down $2.10 or 10.71%. During the extended session, stock further tumbled $0.16 or 0.91% and was at $17.35.

Related listings

  • Court rules Wal-Mart class action can proceed

    Court rules Wal-Mart class action can proceed

    Class Action News 06/01/2007

    [##_1L|1268931702.jpg|width="131" height="91" alt=""|_##]WAL-MART Stores Inc, the world's largest retailer, must face a class-action lawsuit by New Jersey workers claiming the company forced them to work through breaks and cheated them of overtime pa...

  • Class Action Suit Planned Against Casey's

    Class Action Suit Planned Against Casey's

    Class Action News 05/30/2007

    [##_1L|1119118476.jpg|width="130" height="90" alt=""|_##]Two former assistant managers at Casey's General Stores say the convenience store chain didn't pay them overtime wages. Kristina Jones and Kim Marrs say they plan to file a class action lawsuit...

  • Apple, labels slapped with class action suit

    Apple, labels slapped with class action suit

    Class Action News 05/24/2007

    A small record label has filed a class action lawsuit against Apple and other digital music stores as well as the major record labels that carry its catalog of tracks. Dawg Music, which is run by bluegrass musician David Grisman and his partner Craig...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

New York & New Jersey Family Law Matters We represent our clients in all types of proceedings that include termination of parental rights. >> read