Metrolink crash could lead to millions - possibly billions
Class Action News
Even as the first claim was made against Metrolink in the aftermath of the Chatsworth train disaster, legal experts are already saying the crash is likely to lead to hundreds of millions, if not billions in civil lawsuits.
Metrolink's position, say experts, is further complicated because the agency admitted that its own engineer error was the likely cause - a stance from which it is now attempting to back away from.
On Monday, the family of a 19-year-old woman who died in Friday's Metrolink crash announced it has filed a claim against the agency, alleging the agency failed to employ available safety mechanisms to protect commuters.
The claim made by relatives of Aida Magdaleno, a student at California State University, Northridge, is a precursor to filing a lawsuit against a public agency.
The agency already faces a potentially costly trial in the civil lawsuit brought by almost 200 plaintiffs in the Jan. 26, 2005 Metrolink derailment in which 11 people died and another 180 were injured.
Although that crash was caused by a mentally deranged man who last month was sentenced to 11 consecutive life sentences for his role, plaintiffs' lawyers are set to argue safety issues, including Metrolink's practice of pushing trains with the engine in the rear as it does on southbound trains from Ventura to Union Station.
That lawsuit is scheduled for trial next June 8.
As a governmental agency, lawyers noted, Metrolink cannot be subjected to punitive damages in any civil action - a situation those lawyers said likely protects it from a bankruptcy situation.
A spokesman for Metrolink said the agency would not be making any comments on potential legal issues.
Attorney Jerome Ringler, who served as lead counsel for victims of a Metrolink train derailment in Placentia in 2002, those in a Burbank derailment in 2003, and in the Glendale derailment in 2005, said the Chatsworth crash could expose further fault with Metrolink.
"I suspect the real reason these tragedies occurred is due to either simple inattentivenesss on the part of the engineers or a failure on the part of the railrood industry to allow these engineers adequate rest between shifts so that these kind of tragedies could be avoided," Ringler said.
"This is a horrible tragedy. They are facing hundreds upon hundreds of millions of dollars of exposure."
The latest Metrolink crash set off a flurry of activity from some law firms for clients among the victims' relatives - some already calling victims' families or showing up at their homes.
Related listings
-
CHATSWORTH METROLINK DISASTER LAWYERS
Class Action News 09/18/2008Arnie Peterson's evening train, the Metrolink 111, banked to the left, toward the coast. The work week, and the metropolis, faded behind him.He and his fellow travelers were a motley crew -- a lawyer with tasseled loafers; a young man with a shaved h...
-
Billions to be shared by Enron shareholders
Class Action News 09/10/2008Enron Corp. shareholders and investors will split about $7 billion from financial institutions accused of participating in the fraud that caused the once-mighty energy company to collapse.The settlement amount was listed at $7.2 billion, a sum that h...
-
IPhone 3G Draws Second Class Action Suit
Class Action News 09/04/2008[##_1L|1085417111.jpg|width="120" height="138" alt=""|_##]The iPhone 3G has spawned legions of ecstatic customers, along with a small but determined band of critics who have sued over the phone's reported shortcomings. Last week, in a San Diego state...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.