Appeals court panel denies stay for Wash. inmate

Court Alerts

A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has denied a Washington state death row inmate's request for an emergency stay of his execution.

Attorneys for Cal Coburn Brown could now ask the full court to review the case or appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Brown is scheduled to be executed on Sept. 10 for the 1991 torture and murder of 22-year-old Holly Washa, a Burien woman.

Brown is challenging, among other things, the state's new one-drug system for lethal injection.

The three-judge panel rejected his request for a stay in a 2-1 decision on Saturday.

Related listings

  • Lawyer: Ford, family settle in player crash death

    Lawyer: Ford, family settle in player crash death

    Court Alerts 09/03/2010

    An attorney says Ford Motor Co. has settled a Mississippi lawsuit over damages sought from a 2001 rollover crash that killed a New York Mets prospect in the Florida Panhandle.Tab Turner, an attorney for the family of Brian Cole, told The Associated P...

  • Appeals court rules against Ravens in logo dispute

    Appeals court rules against Ravens in logo dispute

    Court Alerts 09/03/2010

    A federal appeals court has ruled against the Baltimore Ravens and the National Football league in a copyright dispute over the team's original logo.A divided three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond ruled Thursday that ...

  • Court denies Scrushy's request for release on bond

    Court denies Scrushy's request for release on bond

    Court Alerts 09/02/2010

    A federal appeals court has denied former HealthSouth CEO Richard Scrushy's request to be released from prison on bond.The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta turned down Scrushy's request late Tuesday.Scrushy has served almost three years ...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

New York & New Jersey Family Law Matters We represent our clients in all types of proceedings that include termination of parental rights. >> read