Appeals court rejects Webcast royalty delay
Court Alerts
[##_1L|1188500512.jpg|width="120" height="88" alt=""|_##]The federal appeals court here on Thursday rejected Webcasters' request to postpone implementation of a new royalty rate for music they air over the Web. The decision hands a court victory to the music industry and performers who have been warring with Webcasters over the rate. By denying the Webcasters' stay, the court let stand the July 15 "true up" date when they are required to give copyright holders a new, higher royalty payment for digitally delivered music.
"This is a major victory for recording artists and record labels whose hard work and creativity provides the music around which the Internet radio business is built," SoundExchange executive director John Simson said. "Notwithstanding this victory, we continue to reach out to the webcasting community to reach business solutions."
SoundExchange was created to distribute the royalty following the 1995 Digital Performance Right in Sound Recording Act. The royalty is split 50-50 between copyright owner, typically a label but sometimes the artists or other entities, and the performer.
Webcasters had challenged the royalty, contending that a panel of copyright royalty judges erred when they dramatically increased the rate this year.
"Digital Media Assn. members and all Webcasters are disappointed by the court's decision and are now forced to make very difficult decisions about what music, if any, they are able to offer," executive director Jonathan Potter said. "The result will certainly be fewer outlets for independent music, less diversity on the Internet airwaves, and far fewer listening choices for consumers. We're hopeful that Congress will take steps to ensure that Internet radio is not silenced, and that Webcasters and SoundExchange will find a way to compromise and maintain the diversity and opportunity of Internet radio."
Related listings
-
NJ man agrees to plead guilty in steroid scheme
Court Alerts 07/13/2007[##_1L|1150168643.jpg|width="130" height="90" alt=""|_##]A pharmaceutical company owner accused of illegally marketing and distributing steroids then paying doctors to write medically unnecessary prescriptions will plead guilty, his attorney said Thu...
-
Court declines to postpone Internet radio royalty hike
Court Alerts 07/12/2007[##_1L|1404390948.jpg|width="130" height="90" alt=""|_##]A federal appeals court Wednesday rejected a plea by Internet broadcasters to prevent new royalties set to begin July 15, charges that Webcasters believe could silence them. The order by the U....
-
Court Puts Off Execution of Texas Hitman
Court Alerts 07/11/2007[##_1L|1340539306.jpg|width="120" height="101" alt=""|_##]A hitman paid $2,000 to gun down a San Antonio woman 15 years ago in a scheme devised by her husband and his brother to collect her life insurance benefits won a reprieve that blocked his sche...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.