Court orders White House to preserve e-mail backups
Court Alerts
[##_1L|1057074316.jpg|width="180" height="128" alt=""|_##]A federal district court judge issued a temporary restraining order today requiring the Bush administration to safeguard backup media files that may contain copies of millions of White House e-mail messages — the subject of ongoing litigation.
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a watchdog group, requested the order last month. It and George Washington University’s National Security Archive are suing the Bush administration for allegedly failing to “recover, restore and preserve certain electronic communications created and/or received within the White House.”
The complaint alleges that since 2003 the Bush administration has illegally discarded about 5 million e-mail messages that it was required to keep under records laws. The plaintiffs are demanding that the missing messages be restored using the backup media files and that the administration implement a new “adequate electronic management system.”
The groups’ lawsuits against the Executive Office of the President, the White House’s Office of Administration, and the National Archives and Records Administration have now been consolidated.
CREW filed for the temporary restraining order after the group said it did not receive adequate assurances from the White House that the backups were being protected.
The decision by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia confirms a magistrate’s earlier recommendation that the order be issued. Under the temporary restraining order, the defendants are required to safeguard all media in their possession as of Nov. 12.
But because the order is not retroactive, it does not clarify what has happened to the backups since 2003, said Meredith Fuchs, the National Security Archive’s general counsel. Concerns that the backups could have been erased in the past four years -- perhaps as part of normal business processes -- coupled with the limited time remaining for the Bush administration prompted the plaintiffs to ask for an expedited discovery process, she said.
The Bush administration formally opposed the early discovery request Nov. 9, she said.
Related listings
-
Court Rejects Request From Detainee
Court Alerts 11/13/2007[##_1L|1196720497.jpg|width="120" height="101" alt=""|_##]The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to consider the case of a Guantanamo Bay detainee fighting U.S. plans to return him to Algeria. Ahmed Belbacha says his life will be in danger from terrori...
-
Supreme Court Could Take Guns Case
Court Alerts 11/10/2007[##_1L|1179536143.jpg|width="131" height="91" alt=""|_##]Supreme Court justices have track records that make predicting their rulings on many topics more than a mere guess. Then there is the issue of the Second Amendment and guns, about which the cou...
-
Court Upholds Elvis Memorabilia Ruling
Court Alerts 11/08/2007[##_1L|1212454322.jpg|width="180" height="128" alt=""|_##]A legal battle over an odd collection of Elvis Presley memorabilia — including a glass device reportedly used to irrigate the King's sinuses before the took the stage — could be nearing an end...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.