Court Will Not Review Conviction In Model's Murder

Court Alerts

[##_1L|1221066723.jpg|width="120" height="88" alt=""|_##]The California Supreme Court refused Wednesday to review the case of a Burbank man convicted of the 1992 murder of a Northridge model, whose remains were found in the Angeles National Forest. David Rademaker had asked the state's highest court to review the case after a state appellate panel rejected his claim that there was insufficient evidence to prove Kimberly Pandelios' killing occurred during a kidnapping.

Rademaker is serving a life prison term without the possibility of parole for his February 2006 first-degree murder conviction for drowning Pandelios in a creek in February 1992.

The 21-year-old victim, who was married and the mother of a 13-month old son, had left home to meet a man for a photo shoot.

Her car was spotted that night on a dirt shoulder north of the Monte Cristo campground along Angeles Forest Highway, and it was found burning early the next morning.

Pandelios' skull and other remains were discovered about a year later in an isolated, heavily wooded area not far from the campground.

Rademaker was indicted in April 2004 for the murder after an informant came forward with new evidence.

A young woman with whom he had a sexual relationship from 1993 to 1995 testified that Rademaker told her he had raped and murdered a model in a stream when she resisted his advances.

Prosecutors said Rademaker lured Pandelios to the forest on the pretext of doing a photo shoot, while the defense contended during the trial that she was likely killed by menacing-looking "biker types."

Pandelios' disappearance was eerily similar to the Nov. 15, 1995, disappearance of model and former Los Angeles Raiders cheerleader Linda Sobek.

Sobek's remains were found eight days later when photographer Charles Rathbun led investigators to a secluded spot in the Angeles National Forest, where her corpse was unearthed from a shallow grave.

Rathbun was convicted a year later of first-degree murder and sexual assault for Sobek's slaying. Like Rademaker, Rathbun was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Related listings

  • Mega Brands awaits court ruling on toy test

    Mega Brands awaits court ruling on toy test

    Court Alerts 10/18/2007

    Canada's biggest toy maker said it was awaiting a court ruling on Wednesday about its fight against claims in a consumer advice magazine that one of its products contained elevated levels of lead.Mega Brands is seeking an injunction in Quebec Superio...

  • Calif. Court OKs Sex Offender Arrests

    Calif. Court OKs Sex Offender Arrests

    Court Alerts 10/16/2007

    [##_1L|1347374286.jpg|width="120" height="101" alt=""|_##]Parole agents can continue sweeps of sex offenders living too close to schools and parks after the state Supreme Court refused to grant a broad injunction halting the arrests. The court had bl...

  • Court Takes Money Laundering Case

    Court Takes Money Laundering Case

    Court Alerts 10/16/2007

    [##_1L|1077900759.jpg|width="180" height="122" alt=""|_##]The Supreme Court agreed Monday to decide whether merely hiding money that is headed out of the United States can constitute money laundering. The case involves the conviction of a man arreste...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

New York & New Jersey Family Law Matters We represent our clients in all types of proceedings that include termination of parental rights. >> read