High court rebuffs Louisiana in child rape case
Court Alerts
The Supreme Court declined Wednesday to revisit its recent decision outlawing executions for people convicted of raping children.
The unusual request, from Louisiana and the Bush administration, was based on the failure of anyone involved in the case to take into account a federal law from 2006 that authorizes the death penalty for members of the military who are convicted of child rape.
The state argued that the case should be reopened because Justice Anthony Kennedy relied in part on what he called a "national consensus" against executing convicted rapists. The court split 5-4 in the June 25 ruling.
The justices, by a 7-2 vote, issued an amended opinion Wednesday that adds a footnote concerning military law, but otherwise leaves the essence of the decision untouched.
The provision of military law setting out punishments for rapists "does not draw into question our conclusions that there is a consensus against the death penalty for the crime in the civilian context and that the penalty here is unconstitutional," Kennedy wrote, joined by the four liberal justices who formed the majority in June.
Reopening the case would have taken five votes, including that of at least one justice who voted to ban the death penalty for rapists.
Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas voted to hear the case again.
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Antonin Scalia dissented from the original opinion, but voted against reopening the case.
Related listings
-
O.J. friend to testify for defense in Vegas trial
Court Alerts 10/01/2008The wedding of a close friend brought O.J. Simpson and other men together last year around a Las Vegas hotel-casino pool, where prosecutors allege plans were made for the armed robbery of two sports memorabilia dealers peddling the former football st...
-
Ex-CIA executive pleads guilty to wire fraud
Court Alerts 09/30/2008A former high-ranking CIA official pleaded guilty Monday to abusing his influence within the agency to direct lucrative contracts toward an old friend who showered him with tens of thousands of dollars worth of gifts.Kyle "Dusty" Foggo, 53, of Vienna...
-
Appeals court reviews ruling on former Qwest CEO
Court Alerts 09/25/2008The insider trading conviction of former Qwest Chief Executive Joe Nacchio is going back to court.The full 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will hear arguments Thursday as judges review a decision overturning Joe Nacchio's April 2007 conviction.Pro...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.