Mars Chocolate Heir Loses Natural Gas Drilling Fight
Court Alerts
An attempt by the reclusive billionaire heir to the Mars chocolate bar fortune to ban drilling for natural gas on his Montana ranch was defeated in a court hearing late on Tuesday.
A judge ruled that Forrest Mars Jr, the former chief executive of the confectionary giant and the son of Forrest Mars Sr, the man credited with inventing M&Ms and the Mars bar, could not prevent Pinnacle Gas Resources from drilling on a 10,000-acre lease it holds for the land beneath Mars's Diamond Cross cattle ranch in south-eastern Montana.
On Monday, Mars employees at the ranch prevented Pinnacle from entering the property when it tried to force its way on to the ranch. Montana law gives companies the right to drill on private land provided they hold a valid lease. The lease expires tomorrow if the company does not commence exploration. Pinnacle said it expected to begin drilling before the end of the week.
"Who the surface owner is should not make any difference, and it didn't today," a Pinnacle attorney, Bryan Wilson, said after the ruling.
In the Diamond Cross case, Pinnacle Gas Resources and another company, Fidelity, have gas and oil leases on the ranch that predate Mars' ownership, according to public records and company officials.
Mars, who is worth an estimated $14bn, owns 82,000 acres along the Tongue river near Montana's border with Wyoming. He is opposed to the drilling because large amounts of underground water are pumped out to access the natural gas. Many farmers view that water as a precious reserve, given the extended drought in the western US.
Mars began buying land in south-eastern Montana in 2003, at the same time that natural gas exploration in the area was booming. He also has residences in Wyoming and Virginia. Since then he has joined several court actions challenging the natural gas industry.
An attorney for Mars, Loren O'Toole, said the objective was not to prevent exploration but to ensure that the water could be returned. "The point is, we can't lose all that water and at the same time have no provision to put it back," O'Toole said.
"Forrest has a lot of money, but he's in the same boat as anybody else," Beth Kaeding, chairwoman of the Northern Plains Resource Council, told the Associated Press news agency.
"If you don't own the mineral rights, it doesn't matter how huge your ranch is, how politically powerful you are, how much money you have. Mineral rights trump surface rights."
Forrest Mars Jr, who was not in court for the hearing, is in his 70s and is one of three children of Forrest Mars Sr, the son of the founder of the company.
Mars is one of the largest family-owned companies in the US, making confectionery, pet food and other products, from Snickers to Whiskas cat food, with $21bn in annual worldwide revenues and an estimated 40,000 employees. The three Mars siblings all featured in last year's top 20 list of the richest Americans, compiled by Forbes magazine.
Pinnacle sued Mars in December after the gas company's employees were told that they would be treated as trespassers if they attempted to enter the ranch.
In separate cases, Mars is suing Pinnacle over plans to develop coal-bed methane on land near his ranch, and is also seeking to block a new railway line in south-eastern Montana that will facilitate the exploitation of the area's coal reserves.
Related listings
-
Not Guilty Plea in Nev. Sex Tape Case
Court Alerts 01/10/2008A man accused of raping a little girl after a videotape of the child being assaulted was found in the Nevada desert pleaded not guilty Wednesday, and a judge set a trial date for April.Chester Arthur Stiles, 37, stood next to his appointed lawyers an...
-
Guilty plea in Middletown fatal shooting case
Court Alerts 01/09/2008A 28-year-old Hartford man has accepted a plea deal in a fatal shooting outside a Middletown barbershop in 2006. Angel DeThomas was one of four people in a car found speeding from the crime scene after Anthony Hall was shot and killed. Last year he r...
-
Court Imposes Strict Deadline in Lawsuit
Court Alerts 01/08/2008The Supreme Court on Tuesday imposed a six-year deadline for suing the federal government in property disputes.The justices ruled 7-2 that a company waited too long to complain in court that the government took the firm's property.The decision came i...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.