Mich. ban on race in college admissions illegal
Court Alerts
A federal appeals court has struck down Michigan's ban on the consideration of race and gender in university admissions.
In a 2-1 decision Friday, the court said Michigan's Proposal 2 is unconstitutional because it burdens minorities. Voters approved the amendment to the state constitution in 2006, and the court notes the only way people who disagree with it can seek change is in another statewide vote.
The law has forced the University of Michigan and other public schools to change admissions policies giving minorities preferential treatment.
The ban passed with 58 percent of the vote nearly five years ago and also applies to government hiring.
California, Nebraska and Washington state have similar bans. Arizona and Colorado voters have rejected them in recent years.
Related listings
-
Ruling changes politics of southern water dispute
Court Alerts 06/30/2011Metro Atlanta started the week under the threat of a court order that could have shut off its main water source for 3 million people, making Georgia the needy neighbor in legal negotiations with neighboring Alabama and Florida.It ends the week holdin...
-
Court won't revive Clemens lawsuit against trainer
Court Alerts 06/28/2011The Supreme Court won't revive baseball star Roger Clemens' lawsuit against his former personal trainer for claiming he injected the pitcher with steroids and human growth hormones.The high court on Tuesday refused to hear an appeal from the seven-ti...
-
Supreme Court to review warrantless GPS tracking
Court Alerts 06/27/2011The Supreme Court will weigh in on an important privacy issue for the digital age: whether the police need a warrant before using a global positioning system device to track a suspect's movements. The justices said Monday they will hear the Obama adm...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.