NJ Court Drops Suit Against Paint Makers

Court Alerts

[##_1L|1036960767.jpg|width="120" height="118" alt=""|_##]The New Jersey Supreme Court on Friday scuttled what little remained of a lawsuit against paint makers by 26 towns and counties that wanted them to cover the cost of removing lead paint, which was banned in 1978 as a health hazard. The 4-2 ruling by the state's highest court was a victory for the manufacturers, which included American Cyanamid Co. (now part of Wyeth (nyse: WYE - news - people )), Sherwin-Williams Co. (nyse: SHW - news - people ) and DuPont (nyse: DD - news - people ).

The court determined that the towns and counties failed to identify a special injury that could be compensated. It said the claim was essentially a products liability issue, and falls under the state Product Liability Act, which excludes coverage for exposure to toxic material.

A lawyer for the towns and counties, Fidelma L. Fitzpatrick, said they were considering whether to ask the court to reconsider its decision, which dismissed the last remaining claim of the lawsuit.

"It means that the New Jersey Supreme Court turned its back on lead-poisoned children of New Jersey, and they allowed the companies that profited from lead paint to turn their back on the children of New Jersey and the crisis that they created," Fitzpatrick said.

Individuals have little recourse to sue because they cannot identify which manufacturer made the paint that is on the walls of their home, Fitzpatrick said.

The paint makers praised the ruling, noting the Missouri Supreme Court had a similar decision on Tuesday.

"These companies are not responsible for risks today from poorly maintained lead paint," said Bonnie J. Campbell, spokeswoman for the paint makers and a former attorney general of Iowa.

New Jersey Public Advocate Ronald K. Chen, who had entered the case in support of the towns and counties, said the ruling was disappointing, but did recognize that landlords must maintain their properties to prevent lead paint from flaking and becoming a health hazard.

The aged housing stock in New Jersey has at least 2 million units with lead paint, Chen said. As a result, 4,547, or nearly 2.5 percent of New Jersey children under 6, had high levels of lead, compared to 1.6 percent nationally, according to the state Department of Health and Senior Services.

The lawsuit was originally filed in December 2001 by Newark, and was later joined by other towns and counties.

A trial judge had dismissed the entire lawsuit, but an appellate panel reinstated the claim charging the manufacturers with creating a public nuisance.

Related listings

  • Judge Suing Dry Cleaner Cries Over Pants

    Judge Suing Dry Cleaner Cries Over Pants

    Court Alerts 06/14/2007

    [##_1L|1070564468.jpg|width="101" height="102" alt=""|_##]A judge had to leave the courtroom with tears running down his face Tuesday after recalling the lost pair of trousers that led to his $54 million lawsuit against a dry cleaner. Administrative ...

  • Wal-Mart workers' suits spur mixed court rulings

    Wal-Mart workers' suits spur mixed court rulings

    Court Alerts 06/13/2007

    [##_1L|1229598667.jpg|width="130" height="90" alt=""|_##]Wal-Mart Stores Inc., facing more than 70 labor-practice lawsuits, won one case in New York and lost two in other states after judges differed on whether employees could sue as a group over cla...

  • Bank of America Calls Dutch Court Action "Shocking"

    Bank of America Calls Dutch Court Action "Shocking"

    Court Alerts 06/08/2007

    In its fight for LaSalle Bank, Bank of America [ticker: BAC] said in an appeal filing that it was “shocking” that the Dutch court would disregard fundamental European Union law.The Charlotte, N.C.-based bank has accused a Dutch court of unlawful acti...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

New York & New Jersey Family Law Matters We represent our clients in all types of proceedings that include termination of parental rights. >> read