NJ court orders changes to witness ID evidence
Court Alerts
New Jersey's highest court has ordered changes to the way eyewitness identifications are used in court, saying the current system is not reliable enough.
The state Supreme Court found that the current process doesn't deter police misconduct and overstates the jury's ability to evaluate identification evidence.
Currently, a defendant has the burden of proving there was undue suggestion during the identification process. That will stay the same.
But the court on Wednesday ordered a pretrial hearing when a defendant can show some evidence of suggestiveness by police. The court also says juries should hear a better explanation of the potential flaws with eyewitness identifications. The new rules will apply to future cases.
Related listings
-
Mo. woman pleads guilty in exported vehicle scheme
Court Alerts 08/24/2011A Missouri woman who prosecutors say played a central role in a scheme to buy more than 300 vehicles with phony titles and improperly export them has pleaded guilty to federal wire fraud. Patrice Robertson pleaded guilty Tuesday as part of a plea agr...
-
Somali gets life in prison for US yacht hijacking
Court Alerts 08/22/2011A federal judge has sentenced a Somali man to life in prison for his role in the hijacking of yacht that left all four Americans on board dead. Ali Abdi Mohamed is the first to be sentenced of 11 men who pleaded guilty to piracy in the case. Mohamed ...
-
Former CEO guilty in 'Ponzi' scheme
Court Alerts 08/18/2011The former CEO of an Austin-based investment firm was found guilty on Wednesday on federal charges that he schemed and defrauded investors out of millions of dollars. Triton Financial CEO Kurt Branham Barton was named in a 39-count indictment allegin...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.