NY appeals court upholds death penalty verdict

Court Alerts

A federal appeals court in Manhattan has upheld the death sentence for Donald Fell, who killed a Vermont supermarket worker as she prayed for her life.

It's the first time since the 1960s that the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled on whether to uphold the death penalty for an individual.

Fell is on death row in Terre Haute, Ind. He was the first man sentenced to death in Vermont in almost 50 years.

He was convicted of carjacking and kidnapping. Terry King was driven to upstate New York, then beaten and kicked to death, in November 2000.

Before that, Fell and an accomplice killed his mother and her companion in Rutland, Vt.

Related listings

  • Supreme Court strikes down 'millionaire's amendment'

    Supreme Court strikes down 'millionaire's amendment'

    Court Alerts 06/26/2008

    The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down the "millionaire's amendment" as an unfair way to help opponents of wealthy political candidates who spend from their personal fortunes.The law allows candidates to receive larger campaign contributions when ...

  • High court rejects case on fast track for border fence

    High court rejects case on fast track for border fence

    Court Alerts 06/23/2008

    The Supreme Court on Monday turned down a plea by environmental groups to rein in the Bush administration's power to waive laws and regulations to speed construction of a fence along the U.S.-Mexican border.Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertof...

  • Supreme Court voids California union law

    Supreme Court voids California union law

    Court Alerts 06/20/2008

    In a defeat for the union movement, the Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a first-in-the-nation law adopted in California that would have barred companies from speaking out against unions if they received state funds. The justices in a 7-2 decisi...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

New York & New Jersey Family Law Matters We represent our clients in all types of proceedings that include termination of parental rights. >> read