US court throws out 17-year terror sentence

Court Alerts

A federal appeals court has thrown out the 17-year prison sentence imposed on convicted terrorism plotter Jose Padilla.

A three-judge panel of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday that the sentence imposed by a Miami federal judge was too lenient. The appeals court sent the case back for a new sentencing hearing.

Padilla and two co-conspirators were convicted in 2007 after a three-month trial in which prosecutors said they sent money, recruits and supplies to Islamic extremist groups including al-Qaida. The appeals ruling upheld all the convictions.

Padilla was arrested in 2002 at Chicago's O'Hare International Airport on suspicion of plotting to set off a radioactive "dirty bomb." He was held for 3 1/2 years as an enemy combatant without a criminal charge.

Related listings

  • Federal fraud charges for ex-Ohio St player

    Federal fraud charges for ex-Ohio St player

    Court Alerts 09/14/2011

    Former Ohio State and NFL quarterback Art Schlichter was charged in federal court Wednesday with fraud linked to a million-dollar ticket-selling scheme.Schlichter deceived people by promising sports tickets at low prices based on his contacts, accord...

  • Court to look at Mich. affirmative action ban

    Court to look at Mich. affirmative action ban

    Court Alerts 09/11/2011

    A federal appeals court says it will take a fresh look at a decision that overturned Michigan's ban on affirmative action in college admissions and government hiring. The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said Friday that a majority of judges agreed ...

  • Court upholds conviction in Iowa coach's death

    Court upholds conviction in Iowa coach's death

    Court Alerts 09/08/2011

    An appeals court has upheld the first-degree murder conviction of a mentally ill man who shot his former football coach in the school's weight room. Mark Becker had argued that he was legally insane when he shot Aplington-Parkersburg High School Coac...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

New York & New Jersey Family Law Matters We represent our clients in all types of proceedings that include termination of parental rights. >> read