Court sets execution date for DC sniper mastermind

Criminal Law

A Virginia judge has set a Nov. 10 execution date for John Allen Muhammad, mastermind of the 2002 sniper attacks in the Washington, D.C., area.

The attorney general's office had requested a Nov. 9 execution. But Muhammad's attorney Jonathan Sheldon says Prince William County Circuit Judge Mary Grace O'Brien delayed it one day.

That's because Nov. 9 is a Monday and they want government offices to be open the day before in case of last-minute court action.

Muhammad was sentenced to death for the slaying of Dean Meyers, one of 10 people shot to death during a 2002 rampage that terrorized the Washington, D.C., area.

Sheldon says Muhammad will appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court and ask the governor for clemency.

Related listings

  • Conn. Supreme Court rejects appeal in 1997 murder

    Conn. Supreme Court rejects appeal in 1997 murder

    Criminal Law 08/24/2009

    The Connecticut Supreme Court has rejected the appeal of one of eight people in the rape and murder of a 13-year-old New Milford girl in 1997. The state's high court in Hartford ruled unanimously Monday to uphold the conviction of Keith Foster. He wa...

  • Man Charged In Milwaukee Mayor Beating

    Man Charged In Milwaukee Mayor Beating

    Criminal Law 08/20/2009

    Prosecutors have charged the 20-year-old man accused of attacking Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett Saturday night with first-degree reckless injury, theft, disorderly conduct and bail jumping. According to the criminal complaint, Barrett and his family me...

  • Sonoma County man guilty in murder of grandfather

    Sonoma County man guilty in murder of grandfather

    Criminal Law 07/27/2009

    A 21-year-old Sonoma County man is facing life in prison without the possibility of parole after being convicted in the shotgun killing of his grandfather. Sean Mooney broke into tears when jurors determined he was guilty Friday of first degree murde...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

New York & New Jersey Family Law Matters We represent our clients in all types of proceedings that include termination of parental rights. >> read