Smithtown contractor admits to bribe
Criminal Law
A Smithtown contractor pleaded guilty to a felony bribery charge on Monday -- the second person to admit guilt and agree to cooperate in a widening buildings department corruption probe that has rocked town government.
Robert Fitzpatrick, 55, of Bayport, pleaded guilty to third-degree bribery before Suffolk County Court Judge Martin Efman. He was released on his own recognizance pending sentencing on July 14.
As part of a plea deal, Fitzpatrick faces a maximum of 1 to 3 years in prison, or as little as no jail time at all.
Prosecutor Kevin Ward said Fitzpatrick admitted to offering a $5,000 bribe to then-chief buildings inspector Robert Bonerba in March 2003 in connection with a house Ward was building for Smithtown developer Frank Esposito.
Ward said Fitzpatrick lied on building permits for the developer's house to save money on permit fees and avoid a higher tax liability.
Rocking back and forth in brown loafers and with his hands folded neatly in front of his blue sport coat, Fitzpatrick said only "yes" and "no" before the judge.
Earlier this month, Esposito, of Nissequogue, pleaded guilty to giving Bonerba a $10,000 bribe. Ward said in court Monday that Fitzpatrick and Esposito evenly contributed $5,000 toward the bribe. Bonerba has not been charged in the case.
Also as part of his plea deal, Fitzpatrick agreed to pay the town $50,000 -- money prosecutors say he gained illegally in the project.
Fitzpatrick now joins Esposito in helping prosecutors understand the depth of town corruption.
"The defendant has entered into a cooperation agreement with the district attorney's office," Ward said in court.
Outside the courtroom, Ward said only, "We are going to follow the evidence wherever it leads us. This investigation is active and ongoing. It encompasses both the town building's department and the rest of town government."
Suffolk County District Attorney Thomas Spota has been investigating the buildings department for two years.
Asked by reporters about his cooperation, Fitzpatrick, said only "Not at this time." His attorney, Fred Schwartz, of Smithtown, also declined to comment.
Bonerba was suspended by the town in December 2006 for failing to properly fill out his financial disclosure statements. Before a hearing could be held to weigh his termination, he retired on a state pension of $31,871.
Bonerba could not immediately be reached for comment.
Related listings
-
Can murder victim's statements be used at trial?
Criminal Law 04/21/2008Dwayne Giles complains that his former girlfriend's statements should not have been used against him at his murder trial because the woman couldn't be cross-examined.Her absence wasn't a result of a scheduling conflict. She was dead. And Giles killed...
-
Hunt on for Clues in Times Square Blast
Criminal Law 03/07/2008Authorities on Friday were investigating whether an explosion at the Times Square military recruiting office was connected to strikingly similar bombings at two foreign consulates in New York, but ruled out a link to mysterious letters sent to Capito...
-
Boy Band Mogul Pearlman Pleads Guilty
Criminal Law 03/07/2008For years, Lou Pearlman wowed banks and investors with slick talk and a lavish lifestyle. But when the one-time architect of the Backstreet Boys and 'N Sync set his hand on a courtroom Bible, he set the act aside. Pearlman pleaded guilty Thursday to ...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.