Court blocks Navy sonar use to protect whales
Environmental
[##_1L|1136253651.jpg|width="127" height="85" alt=""|_##]A federal court issued an injunction on Monday blocking the Navy from using a type of sonar that wildlife supporters say harms whales in exercises off the California coast. The preliminary injunction is a victory for environmental group Natural Resources Defense Council, or NRDC, which filed a lawsuit in March claiming the Navy did not do sufficient environmental testing of its mid-frequency active sonar.
The sonar is used to detect underwater objects like submarines and is critical to readiness training, Navy officials said.
"The U.S. Navy's use of sonar, and the ability to test and train with it, is critical to the national security of the United States," the government argued before the start of the hearing in the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles.
Three tests have taken place off the California coast and 11 more were scheduled through 2009.
But the NRDC claims the sonar, which shoots bursts of sound, is so loud it kills whales.
"Scientists all agree that mid-frequency sonar causes whales to strand and die," said Joel Reynolds, senior attorney at NRDC and director of its marine mammal protection program.
The NRDC filed a similar lawsuit in Hawaii, where a court ordered the Navy to implement measures to protect whales before proceeding with its exercises.
"This is among the most biologically rich areas in the country," Reynolds said about the area off the California coast. "It's an extraordinary place and it's the wrong place to be testing with sonar technology that's known to kill whales."
The NRDC said it expects the judge to issue a final decision later on Monday or Tuesday.
Navy officials said they will appeal.
Related listings
-
Court narrows law environmental protection law
Environmental 07/26/2007[##_1L|1051337674.jpg|width="130" height="130" alt=""|_##]The Michigan Supreme Court on Wednesday put limits on a long-standing state law that allows Michigan citizens to sue over drilling, dredging and development they think would hurt the state's e...
-
US court suspends Shell Beaufort Sea oil drilling
Environmental 07/20/2007U.S. federal appeals court has ordered Royal Dutch Shell Plc to suspend drilling operations on offshore oil blocks in the Beaufort Sea off the north coast of Alaska pending a legal challenge being brought by environmental activists and Alaska Native ...
-
U.S. adopts limits on clean water law enforcement
Environmental 06/07/2007[##_1L|1106075551.jpg|width="140" height="135" alt=""|_##]The landmark U.S. law to fight water pollution will now apply only to bodies of water large enough for boats to use, and their adjacent wetlands, and will not automatically protect streams, th...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.