Abused Women Win Parole After Three Decades of Imprisonment

Headline News

For over 30 years, Carlene Borden, 65, and Vicky Williams, 55, have been incarcerated for the murders of their abusive husbands. Their sentences, life without the possibility of parole for fifty years, were handed down without any evidence of their abuse being presented at their trials. At the time they were arrested, there were few resources for women, domestic violence was poorly understood, and evidence of abuse was not presented at trial, according to the lawyers involved in the case. 

“Today is an extraordinary day for Carlene and Vicky,” said Armstrong Teasdale Attorney Amy Lorenz-Moser, who represents the two women. “We have worked tirelessly for over 10 years to reduce the harsh sentences of women like Vicky and Carlene, which were passed down so many years ago. We are thrilled that the board has finally granted parole to these two survivors of domestic violence.”

The women have remained incarcerated despite a Missouri law enacted in 2007 specifically intended to help the cases of Williams and Borden, said Lorenz-Moser. The law states that offenders who had murdered their spouses would be eligible for parole if they had served at least 15 years in prison, had no prior violent felony convictions, had a history of “substantial physical abuse or sexual domestic violence” not presented at trial, and were sentenced to life in prison with no possibility of parole for 50 years.

The bill was important because, until 1991, spousal rape wasn’t even recognized as a crime under Missouri law. Battered Spouse Syndrome was not a defense in Missouri until the 1980’s. Borden and Williams were convicted in the late 1970’s.

Although both women received two previous parole hearings after the law was passed, the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole denied them freedom. A July 2010 court order allowed the women a third parole hearing, and new parole determinations. Under the guidance of this new order, their parole was finally granted.

Williams is in prison in Chillicothe and Borden is in Vandalia. They are scheduled to be released on Oct. 15.

About Armstrong Teasdale LLP: Armstrong Teasdale LLP, with nearly 250 lawyers in offices across the U.S. and China, has a demonstrable track record of delivering sophisticated legal advice and exceptional service to a dynamic client base. Whether an issue is local or global, practice area specific or industry related, Armstrong Teasdale provides each client with an invaluable combination of legal resources and practical advice in nearly every area of law.

Related listings

  • Judgment Sought Against Mason City Law Firm

    Judgment Sought Against Mason City Law Firm

    Headline News 09/08/2010

    A former Mason City Mayor is facing a lawsuit over a business deal.A Michigan company that creates what they call "laser printed focused collection letters" is seeking a $105,000 judgment against Thomas Jolas and Associates.Focus 1 of Dearborn claims...

  • Attorney: Great Lakes waterways a 'carp highway'

    Attorney: Great Lakes waterways a 'carp highway'

    Headline News 08/24/2010

    Five states are asking a federal judge in Chicago to take emergency action to close two shipping locks and install barriers to prevent Asian carp from overrunning the Great Lakes via a "carp highway."At the first hearing in the case Monday, Judge Rob...

  • Shapiro & Fishman accuses McCollum of grandstanding

    Shapiro & Fishman accuses McCollum of grandstanding

    Headline News 08/23/2010

    Law firm Shapiro & Fishman has accused Attorney General Bill McCollum of pre-election grandstanding and “abuse of power” in connection with McCollum’s recent announcement that his office is conducting a foreclosure fraud investigation into that f...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

New York & New Jersey Family Law Matters We represent our clients in all types of proceedings that include termination of parental rights. >> read