Bromwell pleads guilty in corruption case

Headline News

[##_1L|1121919364.jpg|width="120" height="88" alt=""|_##]Once one of the leading Democrats in the General Assembly, former state Sen. Thomas L. Bromwell Sr. pleaded guilty this morning to accepting bribes from a Baltimore construction company executive in return for the ex-politician's help in winning contracts. Federal prosecutors charged Bromwell, who represented Baltimore County for more than two decades, and his wife, Mary Patricia, in October 2005 with using his political power to help Baltimore-based Poole and Kent in exchange for more than $200,000 in cash, bogus salary and discounted home-improvement materials.

As part of the plea deal his lawyer negotiated with prosecutors, Bromwell, 58, admitted assisting Poole and Kent and its president, W. David Stoffregen, win a multimillion-dollar contract over a competitor with a lower bid for work at the University of Maryland Medical System's Weinberg Building in Baltimore.

Mary Patricia Bromwell, 44, signed a separate plea agreement to a single fraud count for accepting an $80,000-a-year salary for a no-show job from a contractor controlled by Poole and Kent.

If U.S. District Judge J. Frederick Motz follows recommended guidelines, Bromwell will receive a prison term of 6 1/2 years to about eight years for a guilty plea to racketeering conspiracy and tax evasion. His wife could receive up to 2 1/2 years in prison, but her attorneys are more likely to argue for some combination of home detention and probation permitted under the guidelines.

The plea agreement is the climax so far of the largest public corruption investigation in recent Maryland history. Seven other defendants in the case earlier pleaded guilty.

The agreement holds the former senator at least partly responsible for $2.1 million in illegal profits and kickbacks from the scheme with Stoffregen, attorneys said.

In the end, defense lawyers said, the Bromwells agreed to hand over the house where Poole and Kent did construction work valued at more than $85,000. The labor and materials were provided by Stoffregen free or at a reduced cost, according to his guilty-plea agreement.

Bromwell began his political career as a state delegate at age 28. He eventually became chairman of the Senate Finance Committee and one of the state's most powerful politicians. He even kept a large measure of his political clout after he tried, but failed, to overthrow his one-time ally, Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller.

Resigning from public office in May 2002, Bromwell accepted a top post with the Injured Workers' Insurance Fund, a quasi-public agency that is Maryland's largest insurance fund for injured employees.

Related listings

  • Judge criticizes fees in Sears case

    Judge criticizes fees in Sears case

    Headline News 07/23/2007

    [##_1L|1225811536.jpg|width="120" height="88" alt=""|_##]A North Carolina judge has harshly criticized the settlement of a class-action lawsuit in which a Wilmington lawyer and colleagues received $950,000 in fees while consumers who Sears overcharge...

  • EMU's law firm bill to total almost $450,000

    EMU's law firm bill to total almost $450,000

    Headline News 07/21/2007

    The total bill for an independent investigation into a campus cover-up of a student's murder at Eastern Michigan University is nearly $450,000, the lead investigator confirmed Thursday. The financial fallout of the botched handling of information in ...

  • Blagojevich campaign fund pays $1.1 million to law firm

    Blagojevich campaign fund pays $1.1 million to law firm

    Headline News 07/21/2007

    A Chicago law firm has received more than $1.1 million in legal fees from Governor Rod Blagojevich's (bluh-GOY'-uh-vitchz) campaign fund since 2006.So far this year, the governor's campaign has paid Winston and Strawn more than $163,000.The campaign ...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

New York & New Jersey Family Law Matters We represent our clients in all types of proceedings that include termination of parental rights. >> read