Court examines jury selection in doc's slay trial
Headline News
The highest court in Massachusetts is scrutinizing the jury selection process in the trial of a once-prominent doctor who is serving a life sentence in the 1999 killing of his wife.
The Supreme Judicial Court has ordered Judge Paul Chernoff to answer questions about jury selection during the 2001 trial of Dr. Dirk Greineder, an allergist from Wellesley who was convicted of beating his wife, Mabel, with a hammer and slitting her throat.
Greineder's lawyers argue that the jury selection process was closed, violating Greineder's right to a public trial, and are asking for a new trial.
The SJC is asking whether any members of the public were present in the courtroom during questioning of potential jurors and whether Greineder or his lawyer agreed to closed-door proceedings.
Related listings
-
Ludacris Sued For Allegedly Stiffing Former Law Firm
Headline News 10/22/2009Law firm Carlton Fields P.A. has filed suit against Atlanta rapper Ludacris. reports the Courthouse News Service.Luda is being sued for non-payment of legal fees for services rendered between March 2008 and April 2009.The firm represented Ludacris an...
-
Chief justice warns cuts put courts at risk
Headline News 10/22/2009With another round of state budget cuts looming, Margaret H. Marshall, chief justice of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, warned yesterday that financial troubles are clogging the courts, pulling probate officers from Boston schools, and d...
-
Morrison & Foerster to Cut Associates’ Salaries to $145,000
Headline News 10/21/2009Morrison & Foerster LLP, the San Francisco-based law firm, will cut starting salaries to $145,000 for associates based in U.S. cities except New York, where they will remain $160,000, the firm said. “The market for first-year salaries among natio...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.