Judge upholds DC's post-Supreme Court gun laws
Headline News
A federal judge on Friday upheld limitations on gun ownership that the District of Columbia put in place following a 2008 Supreme Court decision overturning the city's outright ban on handguns.
Dick Heller, the plaintiff in the landmark Supreme Court case, had challenged the new regulations, claiming the registration procedures, a ban on most semiautomatic weapons and other limitations violated the intent of the high court's decision.
U.S. District Judge Ricardo M. Urbina sided with the city, saying the Supreme Court decision did not ban reasonable limits on gun ownership designed to promote public safety.
"While the (Supreme) Court recognized that the Second Amendment protects a natural right of an individual to keep and bear arms in the home in defense of self, family and property, it cautioned that that right is not unlimited," he wrote.
The decision by Urbina, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton, moves the case along what is likely to be a lengthy path through the legal system.
"We fully expect to go the Court of Appeals," said Heller's lawyer Richard E. Gardiner.
Related listings
-
McLane absorbs Mass. law firm
Headline News 03/26/2010The McLane Law Firm with offices in Manchester, Portsmouth, and Concord, and Woburn, Mass., announced that the firm has absorbed the Colucci Norman Law Firm, of Beverly, Mass. John Colucci, William Norman, Larry Plavnik, all corporate lawyers and And...
-
Law firms sharpen up as recession cuts legal sector to size
Headline News 03/23/2010A new report warns law firms that they need to modernise or lose out as a major power shift is taking place in favour of the in-house client. The report, which canvassed the opinions of 130 General Counsel and 80 law firm partners around the wo...
-
Legal Volunteer of the Year Awards - April 13
Headline News 03/22/2010Having volunteered countless hours to serve, Elizabeth Wagner will be presented with the Volunteer of the Year Award at the Leadership Awards Luncheon hosted by the Greater Los Angeles Chapter of the Association of Legal Administrators (GLA ALA). Wag...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.