Philadelphia Law Firm Accused Of 'Pay To Play'
Headline News
[##_1L|1061569550.jpg|width="180" height="128" alt=""|_##]Attorney Pat Biswanger filed a federal complaint last month in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against the Philadelphia law firm Cozen O'Connor P.C. Ms. Biswanger claims she was the victim of sexual discrimination and fired illegally from the firm in retaliation for her involvement in Haverford Township politics. Ms. Biswanger claims in her accusation that Delaware County Common Pleas President Judge Kenneth Clouse had inappropriately involved himself in Haverford Township politics led to Judge Clouse contacting Cozen O'Connor and demanding her firing.
In 2004, Judge Clouse hired the politically powerful and well-connected attorney Richard Sprague to sue Ms. Biswanger and Haverford Township Commissioner Andy Lewis on grounds they had defamed him.
Ms. Biswanger alleges Mr. Sprague threatened to include Cozen O'Connor as a defendant in the defamation suit unless the firm agreed to fire her.
In July 2005, the same month former Philadelphia City Treasurer Corey Kemp was sentenced by a federal judge for his role in helping to direct city bond work to firms willing to contribute to, among other things, the mayor's reelection campaign, Ms. Biswanger was asked if she would be interested in applying for the general counsel position in the School District of Philadelphia.
She claims she spoke with Mr. O'Connor about the opportunity. He told her he wanted to recommend someone to the district who would be loyal to his firm and continue to send it bond work.
He allegedly told her he considered the job a "corporate opportunity."
Mr. O'Connor, she says, told her he would recommend her to district CEO Paul Vallas and School Reform Commission Chairman James Nevels. She claims that after she was fired Mr. O'Connor no longer supported her application.
A check of school district records shows corporate bond work was an economic opportunity for the firm. Cozen O'Connor attorneys Alan Wohlstetter and Steven Goldfield served as special council to the district between 2003 and 2005. During that time the firm received fees of $390,000 for its participation in bond issues for the district.
Related listings
-
Law Firm, LPD Among Those Backing Career Academies
Headline News 10/15/2007When the Polk County school system issued a request seeking partnerships from area businesses in creating career academies at high schools, several answered the call. The result is a handful of strong partnerships that will provide relevant instructi...
-
The Survey of Law Firm eMarketing Practices
Headline News 10/12/2007[##_1L|1326749864.jpg|width="90" height="119" alt=""|_##]The law firms in the sample employ a surprisingly low number of editorial employees, a mean of less than one writer per firm. Firms with more than 200 lawyers employed a bit less than 1.5 write...
-
Study: Law firm technology expected to grow
Headline News 10/12/2007[##_1L|1084209754.jpg|width="80" height="146" alt=""|_##]Although the largest U.S. law firms have average annual technology operating budgets of almost $10 million - about 17,000 per lawyer - market penetration by most legal software products is stil...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.