Utah court rejects appeal from polygamous sect
Law & Politics
Utah's Supreme Court has rejected a petition from members of a southern Utah-based polygamous sect seeking a reversal of changes made to its communal land trust.
In a ruling issued Friday, justices say members of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints waited too long to challenge the state's intervention in the United Effort Plan Trust.
Valued at $110 million, the trust holds the property in Hildale, Utah and Colorado City, Ariz., the twin border towns where most church members live.
Utah seized the trust in 2005 after allegations of mismanagement by church leaders. A court-appointed accountant has since converted the trust into a secular entity.
FLDS members consider state control of the UEP a violation of their religious rights.
Related listings
-
Kaine: Don't politicize Michelle Obama's travels
Law & Politics 08/09/2010Democratic Party Chairman Tim Kaine is defending first lady Michelle Obama's vacation trip to Spain, saying critics of her travels are trying to politicize the issue.Kaine tells NBC's "Today" show he thinks "it's wrong" to talk critically about her t...
-
Obama visits company as new job figures come out
Law & Politics 08/06/2010President Barack Obama will visit a small business and talk about job-creation Friday shortly after the government releases unemployment figures for July.The president will tour the facilities of Gelberg Signs in the District of Columbia and publicly...
-
Specter, Yes; Wicker, No, as Kagan vote draws near
Law & Politics 07/15/2010Sen. Arlen Specter says he will support the nomination of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court despite what he calls her "non-answers" to senators' questions during confirmation hearings.In an op-ed piece published Thursday in USA Today, the Pennsylvania...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.