Helms Mulliss & Wicker Receives Top Ranking
Law Firm News
[##_1L|1082784786.png|width="258" height="66" alt=""|_##]Helms Mulliss Wicker, PLLC, (HMW) announced today that it won the top ranking, “Highly Recommended,” in the debut issue of Benchmark: Litigation, The Definitive Guide to America’s Leading Litigation Firms and Attorneys.
HMW received the top ranking as a result of the firm’s success in several recent engagements in which it represented clients including Bank of America, BASF, and SAS Software in commercial or trade secrets litigation. The litigation group’s work on the Lowe’s Motor Speedway pedestrian bridge collapse litigation and Duke University Health System’s surgical sterilization litigation was also recognized.
Benchmark: Litigation also cited five members of the firm’s litigation group for excellence. Peter J. Covington, firm chairman, Douglas W. Ey, Jr., litigation practice area leader, members Jonathan E. Buchan, Jr. and L.D. Simmons II and E. Osborne “Ozzie” Ayscue Jr., the firm’s senior trial lawyer, were highlighted in the review.
“We are honored that a respected publisher of international legal journals highly recommends our firm,” said Covington. “This recognizes our litigation group’s experience and excellence, which allow us to address critical client needs and exceed client expectations.”
Benchmark: Litigation drew on Legal Media Group’s extensive database of contacts, conducting extensive face-to-face interviews with leading legal professionals, in-house counsel, judges and business owners. To be listed in Benchmark: Litigation, a firm needed to be consistently mentioned by peers and clients. To achieve the ranking of “Highly Recommended,” a firm needed to be mentioned most often and defined as being definitively dominant in their particular jurisdiction.
For more information on HMW’s litigation practice, visit www.hmw.com.
About Helms Mulliss & Wicker:
HMW is recognized as one of America’s Best Law Firms by Corporate Board Member magazine, ranked as a Top Ten Bond Counsel by The Bond Buyer, ranked Highly Recommended in Benchmark :Litigation, The Definitive Guide to America’s Leading Litigation Firms and Attorneysand is named a Go-To Law Firm by Corporate Counsel magazine. The firm is comprised of 145 lawyers, 20 who are designated Super Lawyers in the 2007 North Carolina Super Lawyers magazine and 21 who are recognized as Best Lawyers in America. HMW focuses on three practice areas: commercial litigation, complex finance and corporate law. Within these practices, specialty areas include: government relations, securities, mergers & acquisitions, employer services, private equity and others. The firm represents Fortune 100 companies and the nation’s largest financial institutions as well as many high-growth and start-up companies. Helms Mulliss & Wicker maintains offices in Charlotte, Raleigh and Wilmington, NC. For additional information, visit www.hmw.com.
Related listings
-
Ulmer & Berne LLP Adds Three New Associates
Law Firm News 10/30/2007[##_1L|1029167249.jpg|width="120" height="36" alt=""|_##]Ulmer & Berne LLP announced today the addition of three new associates to the Firm. LaDavia Hatcher and Reem Shalodi joined the Firm’s Cleveland office while Dacia Crum joined the Firm’s Ci...
-
Reed Smith to Merge with Richards Butler Hong Kong
Law Firm News 10/23/2007Continuing its global merger march, Reed Smith LLP is uniting with a large Chinese firm to gain entree to legal work in that country's growing legal market. Reed Smith, which has about 150 attorneys in the Bay Area, merged with Richards Butler Hong K...
-
Reed Smith completes merger with London firm
Law Firm News 10/19/2007After more than a year of negotiations, Reed Smith LLP has completed the final piece of last year's merger with London law firm Richards Butler. Richards Butler Hong Kong will merge into the firm, effective Jan. 1. The deal gives Reed Smith 110 lawye...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.