Pro-Life Law Firm Sues Oakland

Law Firm News

A pro-life law firm has filed suit against the city of Oakland for approving an expanded bubble zone that would keep abortion protesters and sidewalk counselors further away from abortion businesses. The Life Legal Defense Foundation filed suit on behalf of pro-life advocate Walter B. Hoye II to keep the city from enforcing the law.

The city council approved the 8-foot zone around the entrances to abortion facilities on Tuesday.

The new ordinance makes it unlawful, and punishable by up to one year in jail, to go within that distance of an abortion business unless heading there for an abortion. It applies to protesters as well as sidewalk counselors who help women with alternatives.

LLDF's suit maintains that the ordinance is a content and viewpoint-based restriction of speech and is unconstitutional.

Hoye regularly engages in pro-life counseling and leafleting at the Family Planning Specialists abortion center in Oakland. Two elderly women from his church often join him.

Hoye told the Oakland City Council that "We are not a threat to public safety and these women aren't even capable of harassing clinic clients."

Their activities include handing out leaflets, education about abortion and holding signs with a pro-life message. All of these activities occur on the public sidewalk.

Local attorney Mike Millen, who filed the lawsuit in conjunction with LLDF, talked about it in a statement sent to LifeNews.com.

"Rather than helping women, this ordinance prevents them from receiving valuable information about their developing baby and options which would let that baby live," he said.

Millen added, "It is sad that city leaders are spending time and money on laws that maximize revenue for the abortion industry at the expense of the health of women and babies."

The lawsuit seeks a temporary restraining order blocking the ordinance.

City Attorney John Russo told the San Francisco Chronicle he thinks the lawsuit will fail and claimed it is about stopping harassment, not First Amendment rights.

"They can distribute literature in City Hall Plaza and on just about any street corner," Russo said. "What they cannot do is harass or intimidate women who are exercising their right to choose and right to privacy."

Related listings

  • Chinese Law Firms Opening In The US

    Chinese Law Firms Opening In The US

    Law Firm News 12/21/2007

    For many years, U.S. law firms have been rushing into China, investing people and resources to help clients on the ground there. Now, a Chinese firm is mimicking their strategy -- opening a representative office in the United States. This year, Guang...

  • Blackwell Sanders to Merge with Husch

    Blackwell Sanders to Merge with Husch

    Law Firm News 12/21/2007

    Two of Missouri’s biggest law firms have agreed to merge, creating a 630-lawyer powerhouse that will rank among the top 100 in the country in size and revenue. Partners at Kansas City-based Blackwell Sanders and St. Louis-based Husch & Eppenberge...

  • Mayer Brown Merges with Hong Kongs JSM

    Mayer Brown Merges with Hong Kongs JSM

    Law Firm News 12/21/2007

    US-based international law firm Mayer Brown and Hong Kong’s Johnson, Stokes and Master are merging in a move that will create the world’s tenth-largest law firm by revenue. The rare trans-pacific merger reflects the increasingly global operations of ...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

New York & New Jersey Family Law Matters We represent our clients in all types of proceedings that include termination of parental rights. >> read