Rosen Law Firm Files Class Action vs. Inphonic, Inc.

Law Firm News


[##_1L|1192034822.jpg|width="169" height="86" alt=""|_##]





The Rosen Law Firm today announced that it has filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on behalf of all purchasers of the common stock of Inphonic, Inc. (the "Company" or "Inphonic") (NASDAQ: INPC) during the period from August 2, 2006 through May 3, 2007.

The complaint charges that Inphonic and certain of its officers and directors violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by issuing materially false and misleading statements concerning the Company's 2006 fiscal year financial results in violation of the federal securities laws and generally accepted accounting principles.

The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period the Company materially misrepresented its net income for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and the interim second, third, and fourth quarters. The Complaint also alleges that the Company improperly recognized revenues for certain cancelled consumer contracts, as well as other errors in the income statement. The Complaint alleges that the cumulative effect of all these errors caused an aggregate net loss of at least $43 to $49 million for fiscal 2006, as compared to the $17.3 million net loss from continuing operations the Company preliminarily announced for fiscal 2006. The Complaint also asserts that certain officers and directors of the Company were able to sell significant amounts of stock during the Class Period while the stock was artificially inflated. As a result of these adverse events, the Complaint asserts that shareholders were damaged.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed on behalf of Inphonic shareholders. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court within 90 days of today. If you wish to join the litigation or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact plaintiff's counsel, Laurence Rosen, Esq. or Phillip Kim, Esq. of The Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via e-mail at lrosen@rosenlegal.com or pkim@rosenlegal.com.

The Rosen Law Firm has expertise in prosecuting investor securities litigation and extensive experience in actions involving financial fraud. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the nation, concentrating its practice in securities class actions.

Related listings

  • McDermott Ranks Among Top 20 Legal Advisors

    McDermott Ranks Among Top 20 Legal Advisors

    Law Firm News 05/05/2007

    [##_1L|1223665935.jpg|width="158" height="61" alt=""|_##] McDermott Will & Emery ranked among the top 20 M&A legal advisors in several first quarter deal tables, including Bloomberg (Global Legal M&A and Global Financial M&A), Thomson...

  • Bingham McCutchen buys Los Angeles law firm

    Bingham McCutchen buys Los Angeles law firm

    Law Firm News 05/02/2007

    Continuing its steady growth, Bingham McCutchen LLP has acquired Alschuler Grossman LLP, a 40-lawyer Los Angeles firm, bringing Bingham's head count to nearly 1,000 lawyers. The Boston-based firm is merging with Alschuler Grossman LLP, a 40-lawyer ou...

  • Dr. Hinder Joins Hogan & Hartson's Berlin Office

    Dr. Hinder Joins Hogan & Hartson's Berlin Office

    Law Firm News 05/01/2007

    [##_1L|1294718755.jpg|width="182" height="56" alt=""|_##] Hogan & Hartson LLP announced today that Dr. Jens-Uwe Hinder will strengthen the firm’s Berlin office. Dr. Hinder joins Hogan & Hartson from Hammonds, where he has practiced as a partn...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

New York & New Jersey Family Law Matters We represent our clients in all types of proceedings that include termination of parental rights. >> read