Calif. high court refuses appeal of no-burn rule

Lawyer Blogs

The state's highest court has refused to hear an appeal of a San Francisco Bay area air pollution regulation that bans burning Duraflame logs and other fuels on bad air nights.

The California Supreme Court's refusal affirms a Bay Area Air Quality Management District limit on burning wood, fire logs or wood pellets on nights when air quality is expected to exceed public health standards.

The appeal was brought by Duraflame Inc., which argued that its logs burn cleaner than other fuel types and should be exempt from the ban.

Duraflame appealed to California's high court after losses in both Alameda County Superior Court and a state appeals court.

Related listings

  • Pa. judge gives 'gurney attorney' court deadline

    Pa. judge gives 'gurney attorney' court deadline

    Lawyer Blogs 01/04/2011

    An attorney charged with stealing $99,000 from two elderly couples he represented has met a judge's deadline to appear in court for trial.Fifty-three-year-old Mark Morrison didn't appear for trial Monday after his attorney said he couldn't arrange fo...

  • Supreme Court to cut costs to fight deficit

    Supreme Court to cut costs to fight deficit

    Lawyer Blogs 01/01/2011

    The Supreme Court will join Congress and the president next year in cutting costs to reduce the federal deficit, Chief Justice John Roberts said Friday in his year-end report.Roberts asked the court's staff to cut unnecessary expenses and improve ope...

  • Iowa Supreme Court upholds taxation of KFC

    Iowa Supreme Court upholds taxation of KFC

    Lawyer Blogs 12/31/2010

    The Iowa Supreme Court has upheld a decision to levy corporate income taxes against fried chicken giant KFC.At question is whether the state can impose income tax on revenue received by a company that doesn't have a presence in Iowa. KFC doesn't own ...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

New York & New Jersey Family Law Matters We represent our clients in all types of proceedings that include termination of parental rights. >> read