Comcast Wins Legal Battle With Direct T.V.
Lawyer Blogs
A legal battle between Comcast Corp. and the DirecTV Group in Los Angeles ended in DirecTV having to stop attacking Comcast in its ads.
The two companies charged each other with false advertising, but Comcast won out last week when U.S. District Judge John Grady told DirecTV it can't cite false studies claiming its High definition product is better than Comcast's, said The Hollywood Reporter Sunday.
DirecTV was using "favorable results" from a TNS survey in recent ads, though the judge said the survey compared a DirecTV digital signal to an analog signal from Comcast.
Another ad cited a survey from Alliance Consulting Group of professional home-theater installers that claimed they preferred the picture quality of DirecTV over cable, though the judge deemed that one unfair, as well.
Grady's ruling said DirecTV must "immediately cease and refrain in any territory in which Comcast provides cable television" advertising any claims stemming from the TNS or Alliance Consulting Group surveys.
Related listings
-
NSA spying programme argued at court hearing
Lawyer Blogs 08/17/2007[##_1L|1237978050.jpg|width="120" height="88" alt=""|_##]A US appeals court has agreed to weigh a government motion to dismiss a lawsuit alleging that the National Security Agency (NSA) monitored phone lines and emails without a warrant, but judges a...
-
White House backs banks in Supreme Court case
Lawyer Blogs 08/16/2007[##_1L|1083995532.jpg|width="100" height="112" alt=""|_##]The brief by the U.S. solicitor general contradicts a brief filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission, which argued for shareholders' rights to sue those third parties. "Allowing liabili...
-
Brodsky & Smith, LLC Announces Settlement of Class Action
Lawyer Blogs 08/16/2007Brodsky & Smith, LLC announces that a Court has preliminarily approved a class action settlement in TDH Partners v. The Ryland Group, Inc., et. al. involving all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired common stock of the Ryland Group, Inc. (...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.