Court puts hold on Qualcomm import ban

Lawyer Blogs

[##_1L|1113198582.jpg|width="120" height="88" alt=""|_##]South Korean handset makers on Thursday welcomed a US appeals court ruling that halted an import ban on mobile phones containing Qualcomm’s 3G chipsets, a legal victory in the chipmaker’s patent dispute with rival Broadcom. The court’s stay, pending appeal, would allow third parties including LG Electronics, Motorola, Samsung Electronics, Sanyo and AT&T to import certain handsets into the US.

Samsung and LG are key Qualcomm customers and were seen as the most likely victims of the ban announced in June. But the companies said that their US business had so far not been affected by the ban, which was supposed to take effect from this month. Both groups had been making alternative supply arrangements.

LG, which has heavy exposure to the US CDMA market, said: ”The ban might have depressed the whole US handset market.”

Samsung also welcomed the ruling.

The news drove LG’s shares up 4.25 per cent to Won76,100 and Samsung’s 0.36 per cent to Won562,000, while the broader market closed up 1.9 per cent yesterday.

On Wednesday, a judge in Washington agreed that the third parties had demonstrated ”a substantial case on the merits and the harm factors weigh[ed] in their favour”.

LG shipped 37 per cent of its total handset sales to the US last year. It sold 64m units of handsets last year and controls 15.2 per cent of the US market. Samsung sold 27 per cent of its total handset sales, which amounted to 37.4m units, in the US in the second quarter, according to Nomura International.

The International Trade Commission on June 7 imposed the ban after finding that Qualcomm had infringed a Broadcom power-saving patent. The two sides have been unable to reach agreement on compensation out of court.

Alex Rogers, legal counsel for Qualcomm, said: ”We are pleased that the court of appeals recognised the undeserved harm to parties who were not named in the lawsuit, and that our customers will continue to be able to introduce new products into the US marketplace during the appeals process.”

Qualcomm’s technology is included in all 3G handsets, meaning that a full ban on cellphones carrying its chips might potentially have hampered the take-up in the US of the next generation of wireless technology.

In February, LG, which has strength in the 3G business, won a contract from GSM Association to supply a low cost handset for 3G mobile phone networks under the banner ”3G for All”.

Related listings

  • Craig files papers in attempt to reverse guilty plea

    Craig files papers in attempt to reverse guilty plea

    Lawyer Blogs 09/12/2007

    [##_1L|1244834161.jpg|width="130" height="94" alt=""|_##]Sen. Larry Craig has filed papers to withdraw his guilty plea in an airport sex sting, arguing that he entered the plea under stress caused by media inquiries into his sexuality. But a spokesma...

  • States Ask for 5 Year Extension of Microsoft Judgment

    States Ask for 5 Year Extension of Microsoft Judgment

    Lawyer Blogs 09/12/2007

    [##_1L|1366881248.jpg|width="120" height="138" alt=""|_##]A group of state plaintiffs in the U.S. Microsoft antitrust case will ask for a five-year extension of a large portion of the 2002 judgment aginst the company, the group's lawyer said Tuesday....

  • Craig's lawyers: Guilty plea was product of panic

    Craig's lawyers: Guilty plea was product of panic

    Lawyer Blogs 09/10/2007

    [##_1L|1306343305.jpg|width="127" height="85" alt=""|_##]Under pressure from a newspaper investigation, Sen. Larry Craig "panicked" and pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct in a Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport men's room, according to cour...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

New York & New Jersey Family Law Matters We represent our clients in all types of proceedings that include termination of parental rights. >> read