Court says California mall's chat policy illegal
Lawyer Blogs
A Northern California appeals court has struck down a shopping mall's policy barring people from approaching strangers to chitchat.
The 3rd District Court of Appeal this week said the rules at Roseville's Westfield Galleria violate the California Constitution's free speech guarantee.
The mall prohibited people in its common areas from approaching people they didn't know to talk unless the conversation was about business involving the mall or its tenants. The case arose after mall officials issued a citizen's arrest of a 27-year-old pastor who tried to talk about his faith.
The appeals court says the policy effectively bars shoppers from chatting about the weather or offering directions.
A spokeswoman for Westfield says the mall is considering appealing to the California Supreme Court.
Related listings
-
Federal appeals court in NY rules against ACORN
Lawyer Blogs 08/13/2010A federal appeals court in New York City has thrown out a decision that barred Congress from withholding funds from the activist group ACORN.The ruling Friday reverses a decision by a district court. That judge found Congress had violated ACORN's rig...
-
NY governor's aide surrenders on assault charge
Lawyer Blogs 08/12/2010An aide to New York Gov. David Paterson surrendered Thursday to New York City authorities on assault charges stemming from a 2009 domestic violence case that touched off an evidence-tampering investigation in Albany.David Johnson turned himself in to...
-
Calif. coach, USA Swimming sued over alleged abuse
Lawyer Blogs 08/12/2010A California woman sued the governing body of U.S. competitive swimming and her former coach, claiming he sexually abused, humiliated and harassed her when she was a teenager training under his supervision.The suit announced Wednesday is one of sever...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.