Court says gunmaker can't be sued over LA rampage
Lawyer Blogs
An appeals court has rejected a lawsuit against a gunmaker over a 1999 shooting rampage at a San Fernando Valley Jewish center.
The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in Los Angeles ruled Monday that a federal law shielding gunmakers from suits over criminal use of their products was constitutional.
White supremacist Buford Furrow wounded five people, including three children, at a Jewish community center in Granada Hills. He later killed a postal carrier.
Furrow pleaded guilty and got life in prison.
Relatives of victims sued Georgia-based Glock Inc., RSR Wholesale Guns Seattle and a Chinese manufacturer. Monday's ruling said Glock and the Seattle dealer were immune. The case against China North Industries Corp. can proceed.
Related listings
-
Demjanjuk offers no clues to possible surrender
Lawyer Blogs 05/10/2009Possibly days away from his deportation to Germany, suspected Nazi guard John Demjanjuk and his family are offering no clues about the 89-year-old's response to a government notice asking that he surrender to U.S. immigration authorities. All appeare...
-
Ex-Top Democratic Donor Pleads Guilty To Fraud
Lawyer Blogs 05/09/2009Norman Hsu, a former top fund-raiser for the Democratic Party, pleaded guilty Thursday to running a fraudulent investment scheme but he continues to fight charges of making fraudulent political contributions. Hsu, 58 years old, pleaded guilty to five...
-
Ex-Top Democratic Donor Pleads Guilty To Fraud
Lawyer Blogs 05/08/2009Norman Hsu, a former top fund-raiser for the Democratic Party, pleaded guilty Thursday to running a fraudulent investment scheme but he continues to fight charges of making fraudulent political contributions. Hsu, 58 years old, pleaded guilty to five...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.