Court wrestles with TV profanity case
Lawyer Blogs
The Supreme Court spent an hour on Tuesday talking about dirty words on television without once using any or making plain how it would decide whether the government could ban them.
The dispute between the broadcast networks and the Federal Communications Commission is the court's first major broadcast indecency case in 30 years.
At issue is the FCC's policy, adopted in 2004, that even a one-time use of profanity on live television is indecent because some words are so offensive that they always evoke sexual or excretory images. So-called fleeting expletives were not treated as indecent before then.
The words in question begin with the letters "F" and "S." The Associated Press typically does not use them.
Chief Justice John Roberts, the only justice with young children at home, suggested that the commission's policy is reasonable. The use of either word, Roberts said, "is associated with sexual or excretory activity. That's what gives it its force."
Justice John Paul Stevens, who appeared skeptical of the policy, doubted that the f-word always conveys a sexual image.
Related listings
-
Amputee awaits high court, wants musical glow back
Lawyer Blogs 10/31/2008[##_1L|1287159052.jpg|width="120" height="88" alt=""|_##]When Diana Levine turned 63 recently, her daughter made her a birthday card, drawing on Greek mythology with an illustration of Diana the Huntress, her bow string drawn taut, an arrow ready to ...
-
Fla. ruling will help widow's anthrax lawsuit
Lawyer Blogs 10/30/2008A Florida Supreme Court ruling issued Thursday will help the widow of an anthrax victim make her case that the government was ultimately responsible for her husband's death.Maureen Stevens' husband, Robert, was a photo editor who was exposed to anthr...
-
Feds: Suspect in hoax anthrax scare did it before
Lawyer Blogs 10/30/2008A California man suspected of mailing more than 120 hoax anthrax letters to media outlets was interviewed previously by the FBI after one similar mailing in 2007, but he was not charged.Marc M. Keyser, 66, was interviewed by the FBI in January 2007 f...
New Rochelle, New York Personal Injury Lawyers
If you or a loved one has been injured in an accident, contact Kommer, Bave & Ollman, LLP, in New Rochelle, New York, immediately. We can answer all your questions and work with you to determine if you have the grounds for a personal injury lawsuit. The attorneys at our firm are determined to resolve even the most difficult of cases. We will work closely with you to determine the best course of action to get your claim or case resolved in the most efficient way possible. We will fight for your right to compensation! No one should have to suffer a financial burden from the result of another person’s carelessness. The attorneys at Kommer, Bave & Ollman, LLP will aggressively fight to ensure that justice is served on your behalf.