Ex-broker's Enron-related case may be near end
Lawyer Blogs
A federal judge has ordered a one-month delay in the Enron-related May retrial of a former Merrill Lynch executive.
U.S. District Judge Ewing Werlein Jr. agreed to delay Robert S. Furst's retrial to June 1 to accommodate plea negotiations. Prosecutors and defense attorneys told Werlein during a hearing Friday that they are close to a deal that would resolve the case.
Furst and two other executives were convicted in 2004 of helping push through Enron's sham sale to Merrill Lynch of three power barges moored off the Nigerian coast in 1999. The deal was struck to make the Enron energy division's earnings appear larger.
But an appeals court threw out their fraud and conspiracy convictions in 2006 after finding fault with the prosecution's legal theory.
Related listings
-
Supreme Court Stays out of Asian Carp Dispute
Lawyer Blogs 04/26/2010The U.S. Supreme Court decided Monday not to get involved in a dispute over how to prevent invasive Asian carp from making their way into the Great Lakes.The justices turned down a new request from Michigan to consider ordering closure of Chicago-are...
-
US court gives government victory against ACORN
Lawyer Blogs 04/22/2010A federal appeals court has handed the government a victory by temporarily blocking a judge's finding that Congress shouldn't have halted federal funding to the activist group ACORN.The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan issued the order ...
-
Debt Collectors Can Face Lawsuits for Mistakes
Lawyer Blogs 04/21/2010The Supreme Court Wednesday made it easier for consumers to sue debt collectors for sending erroneous collection notices. The high court, in a 7-2 opinion by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, ruled that debt collectors can't shield themselves from such lawsui...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.