High court refuses to hear insider trading appeal
Lawyer Blogs
The Supreme Court has refused to hear former Qwest CEO Joseph Nacchio's appeal of his insider trading conviction.
The court said Monday it would not entertain Nacchio's request that he either be acquitted of the charge or granted a new trial.
Prosecutors said Nacchio sold $52 million worth of stock in 2001 while knowing that Denver-based Qwest Communications International Inc. would have trouble meeting its sales goals. Nacchio began serving a six-year sentence on April 14.
He contended the jury was given improper instructions about what internal information had to be disclosed publicly. He also argued that the trial judge improperly barred testimony from an expert who could have explained Nacchio's trading patterns.
Related listings
-
Court won't force Ill. to have 'Choose Life' plate
Lawyer Blogs 10/05/2009The Supreme Court has refused to hear an anti-abortion's group request to force a state to issue "Choose Life" license plates.The high court on Monday left in place a federal appeals court ruling that state officials were within their rights in tryin...
-
Court to weigh lawsuit against former Somali PM
Lawyer Blogs 10/01/2009The Supreme Court will consider throwing out a human rights lawsuit against a former prime minister of Somalia who is accused of overseeing killings and other atrocities.The court said Wednesday it would review an appeals court ruling allowing Somali...
-
NJ court reinstates ban on voting site exit polls
Lawyer Blogs 10/01/2009The New Jersey Supreme Court has reinstated a ban on exit polls, surveys taken of people as they leave their voting places.It also has kept in place a ban on distributing leaflets or other materials within 100 feet of polling places. It said Wednesda...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.