MA. court to weigh Wal-Mart discrimination case

Lawyer Blogs

The state’s highest court is set to hear arguments this week in the case of a former Wal-Mart pharmacist who claimed she was fired after asking to be paid the same as her male colleagues.


Cynthia Haddad filed the gender discrimination lawsuit after she fired in April 2004 after 10 years at the Pittsfield Wal-Mart.

In 2007, a Berkshire Superior Court awarded Haddad nearly $1 million in compensatory damages and $1 million in punitive damages. The company appealed.

A judge upheld the compensatory damages but agreed to revoke the punitive damages, saying there was insufficient basis for the jury’s decision.

On Thursday, both sides make their case on the issue of the punitive damages before the Supreme Judicial Court.

Related listings

  • Miner's Widow Seeks $37M In Damages

    Miner's Widow Seeks $37M In Damages

    Lawyer Blogs 02/01/2009

    The widow of an eastern Kentucky coal miner who died on the job last year has sued one of the nation's largest coal companies for more than $37 million in damages. The Lexington Herald-Leader reports that an attorney for Susie Sturgill, widow of mine...

  • NYC grand jury indicts lawyer eyed in $400M fraud

    NYC grand jury indicts lawyer eyed in $400M fraud

    Lawyer Blogs 01/30/2009

    A New York City grand jury has indicted a lawyer suspected of bilking hedge funds out of more than $400 million. The indictment returned Thursday in federal court in Manhattan charges Marc Dreier with conspiracy to commit securities and wire fraud. D...

  • Texas executes inmate for killing fellow prisoner

    Texas executes inmate for killing fellow prisoner

    Lawyer Blogs 01/30/2009

    Texas has executed a prison gang member who fatally injected a fellow inmate with an overdose of heroin in retaliation for snitching on him. Ricardo Ortiz was pronounced dead at 6:18 p.m. Thursday.The 46-year-old was the fifth Texas inmate to die thi...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

New York & New Jersey Family Law Matters We represent our clients in all types of proceedings that include termination of parental rights. >> read