Trial of Texas judge over death-row appeal ends
Lawyer Blogs
The misconduct trial of a Texas judge who refused to keep her court open for lawyers trying to stop an execution that night ended Thursday with her attorneys insisting she did nothing wrong.
Judge Sharon Keller, the presiding judge of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, watched from her defense table while her attorney denounced accusations that she closed her court to death-row inmate Michael Wayne Richard as meritless and outrageous.
"Judge Keller didn't close the court to anybody," said Chip Babcock, Keller's attorney. "Michael Richard's lawyers never knocked on the right doors and they gave up."
Mocked as "Sharon Killer" by her detractors, Keller could be removed from the bench if the five judicial misconduct charges against her are upheld. At the heart of the charges is whether Keller denied Richard the ability to file a late appeal in the hours before his Sept. 25, 2007 execution.
Babcock's closing presentation, at times theatrical, was delivered as forcefully as Keller's unrepentant testimony earlier in the trial. He ended by going after those he said helped put the career of the state's highest criminal appeals judge in jeopardy: death-penalty critics.
Related listings
-
Court: Religious items OK in Conn. postal facility
Lawyer Blogs 08/21/2009An appeals court has reversed a federal judge's order that religious displays be removed from a Connecticut store that offers postal services. In a decision released Thursday, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals says Sincerely Yours Inc. in Manches...
-
Ore. court rejects car salesman in ethics appeal
Lawyer Blogs 08/21/2009A manager at an Oregon car dealership said he was fired because he insisted on being an honest salesman. The state supreme court disagreed Thursday. Kevin Lamson argued he was wrongfully discharged from Crater Lake Motors in Medford after he told his...
-
NYC judge returns investor lawsuits to state court
Lawyer Blogs 08/21/2009A judge has rejected mortgage lender Countrywide Financial's effort to have some investor lawsuits heard in federal court. Judge Richard Holwell in Manhattan concluded in a decision released Tuesday that Congress did not intend for a federal court to...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.