US judge fines British Air $300 mln in price fixing
Lawyer Blogs
[##_1L|1148583576.jpg|width="180" height="135" alt=""|_##]US judges have accepted a guilty plea from British Airways over its role in a price-fixing cartel. A court sitting in Washington ruled that the airline should be fined $300m (£150m) - a sum previously agreed between BA and the US Department of Justice. Now that the fine has been agreed, attention will turn to whether senior British Airways staff will face criminal investigation for their part in the cartel involving BA and Virgin Airways. The American fine followed a detailed investigation on both sides of the Atlantic.
Investigations in the UK were led by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT), which has already fined BA £121.5m. As rival Virgin Atlantic tipped off the OFT about the price-fixing scandal, it was granted immunity.
It was the first time that the UK and the US have simultaneously brought action against a company. BA had colluded with Virgin Atlantic on at least six occasions between August 2004 and January 2006, the OFT found. During that time, fuel surcharges rose from £5 to £60 per ticket.
BA's chief executive Willie Walsh has insisted that passengers had not been overcharged because fuel surcharges were "a legitimate way of recovering costs".
However, he has acknowledged that the conduct of some of the carrier's employees had been wrong and could not be excused.
"Anti-competitive behaviour is entirely unacceptable and we condemn it unreservedly," Mr Walsh said earlier this month.
In October 2006, BA's commercial director, Martin George, and communications chief, Iain Burns - who had been on leave of absence since the inquiry into the surcharges began - quit the company.
Related listings
-
Lawsuit Filed Over California Teachers Qualifications
Lawyer Blogs 08/22/2007[##_1L|1255996298.jpg|width="130" height="90" alt=""|_##]Your child's school may call its teachers highly qualified, but that could really mean: still in college. Parents in two bay area school districts are now suing the U.S. department of education...
-
Vick football future in doubt after dog-fighting plea
Lawyer Blogs 08/22/2007Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Vick may never play in the National Football League again after agreeing on Monday to plead guilty in a dog-fighting case.Vick, 27, faces up to five years jail if convicted on the initial charges related to the dog...
-
NFL star Vick's guilty plea exposes brutal hobby
Lawyer Blogs 08/21/2007[##_1L|1015515088.jpg|width="120" height="101" alt=""|_##]STAR gridiron quarterback Michael Vick looks set to trade in his career for jail, after agreeing to plead guilty to running an illegal dog-fighting ring. The Atlanta Falcons player has been ac...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.