Wash. high court lifts stay of execution for Brown

Lawyer Blogs

Washington state's Supreme Court has lifted the stay of execution for a death row inmate who claimed the state's method of lethal injection violated constitutional bans on cruel and unusual punishment.

The high court unanimously ruled Thursday that Cal Coburn Brown's claims are moot because the state Department of Corrections changed its method of execution earlier this year from a three-drug cocktail to a one-drug system.

The court issued a stay last year just hours before Brown was set to die for torturing and killing a Burien woman in 1991. The state can now reschedule the execution, but the earliest it could happen is September.

Related listings

  • Top court rejects Canadian serial killer's appeal

    Top court rejects Canadian serial killer's appeal

    Lawyer Blogs 07/30/2010

    Canada's top court is upholding six murder convictions of a pig farmer accused of butchering women and feeding them to pigs.Canada's Supreme Court said Friday that Robert Pickton's right to a fair trial was not violated the first time around, and den...

  • BP spill cases head to court as Shell counts cost

    BP spill cases head to court as Shell counts cost

    Lawyer Blogs 07/29/2010

    The tide of lawsuits unleashed by BP's oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico breaks into an Idaho courtroom on Thursday, just as the company's rivals are counting the cost of a ban on offshore drilling.Attorneys hoping to lead the legal fight against BP ar...

  • Mass. judge who wrote gay marriage ruling retiring

    Mass. judge who wrote gay marriage ruling retiring

    Lawyer Blogs 07/22/2010

    Massachusetts Chief Justice Margaret Marshall said Wednesday that while she understands her tenure on the state's high court will always be linked to the legalization of gay marriage, that case holds no greater importance in her mind than the hundred...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

New York & New Jersey Family Law Matters We represent our clients in all types of proceedings that include termination of parental rights. >> read