Appeals court rejects tax case of McVeigh's lawyer
Lawyer News
An appeals court affirmed Timothy McVeigh's lawyer cannot claim a charitable tax deduction for donating prosecution materials from the Oklahoma City bombing case.
The three-judge panel of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday upheld a tax court ruling that threw out the deduction claimed by Stephen Jones for material he collected as lead defense counsel in McVeigh's trial for the 1995 bombing that killed 168 people.
Jones told The Associated Press on Monday that the courts agreed the value of the gift is not deductible, but the appellate court rejected what Jones characterized as "ill-tempered language" in the tax court's opinion of his case.
Jones said the Internal Revenue Service treated him and his wife, Sherrel, with "a cavalier, condescending, unprofessional attitude and behavior from beginning to end."
He said he asked that the agency's Oklahoma City office be disqualified from the case because some IRS workers there had experienced losses in the bombing, which injured hundreds of people and damaged areas of downtown.
A spokesman for the IRS in Dallas, Clay Sanford, declined comment on the case because of federal disclosure regulations that prohibit public discussion of individual tax matters.
An appraiser hired by Jones valued the materials at $294,877, and Jones and his wife claimed a tax deduction for that amount. He said he received the deduction for four years before the IRS rejected it and sent Jones a notice of tax deficiency for $14,785.
In upholding the tax court ruling, the Denver-based appellate court said the size of the deduction Jones could claim was limited to the amount he had paid or invested, which was none.
Jones gave the prosecution and defense materials to the University of Texas, which he attended as an undergraduate. The archive includes transcripts, FBI reports, correspondence, videotapes and other materials.
Related listings
-
I.R.S. Plans a Deduction for Madoff Victims
Lawyer News 03/17/2009The Internal Revenue Service will allow victims of Bernard L. Madoff’s investment fraud to claim a lucrative tax deduction related to the bulk of their losses, the I.R.S. commissioner testified Tuesday morning before the Senate Finance Committee . Th...
-
Ex-US congressman from Oregon faces tax charges
Lawyer News 01/30/2009A former Oregon congressman was indicted Thursday on federal money laundering and tax charges that prosecutors said were related to an investment fraud scheme that bilked victims out of more than $10 million.Former Rep. Wes Cooley, who represented Or...
-
Calif. court rejects lawsuit against tax increases
Lawyer News 01/09/2009An anti-tax group will consider new legal action after a California appeals court tossed out a lawsuit that sought to block tax increases passed by Democrats in the state Legislature, the group said Thursday.Citing separation of powers, the state's 3...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.