Court to clarify witness identification rules

Legal News Center

The Supreme Court will decide whether a witness identification of a man suspected in a break-in of a car should be thrown out.

The high court on Tuesday agreed to hear an appeal from Barion Perry, who is in prison for breaking into a car in 2008.

A woman said she saw Perry take things from the car, but only after police had him in handcuffs. She later could not pick him out of a photo lineup, and could not describe the suspect.

Perry wanted her identification thrown out because it was "unnecessarily suggestive" that he was a criminal because he was in handcuffs. The New Hampshire Supreme Court disagreed, and upheld his conviction.

Related listings

  • Gov. Rick Perry signs tort reform bill into law

    Gov. Rick Perry signs tort reform bill into law

    Legal News Center 05/30/2011

    Gov. Rick Perry signed into law Monday a measure that will limit frivolous lawsuits by levying some fees on plaintiffs and allowing meritless suits to be dismissed early in the process. Perry designated the "loser pays" bill a top priority of the leg...

  • Fugitive Russian lawmaker living in Beverly Hills

    Fugitive Russian lawmaker living in Beverly Hills

    Legal News Center 05/29/2011

    A sensational dispute between Moscow billionaires with a storyline that rivals Hollywood has spilled across international borders: Surveillance photographs showed a fugitive Russian lawmaker living in Beverly Hills, California. Someone tried to hack ...

  • Goodwin Liu withdraws judicial nomination

    Goodwin Liu withdraws judicial nomination

    Legal News Center 05/26/2011

    Appeals court judicial nominee Goodwin Liu says that although several Western states have a "desperate need for judges," he's dropping the fight. Liu tells President Barack Obama he is withdrawing his nomination after Senate Republicans blocked a vot...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

New York & New Jersey Family Law Matters We represent our clients in all types of proceedings that include termination of parental rights. >> read