Minn. court says hoisting pants not illegal search
Legal News Center
A Minnesota court says pulling up the saggy pants of a crime suspect is not an illegal search, even if it turns up a gun.
The Minnesota Court of Appeals ruling Tuesday came in a case that arose after a drug suspect was stopped by St. Paul police officers.
The St. Paul Pioneer Press reports that the man's jeans fell down when he put his hands up, prompting an officer to hoist up the droopy drawers. In the process, the officer found a gun.
The man was later sentenced to five years in prison for illegally possessing a firearm.
On appeal, his attorney argued the gun was found in an illegal search.
But the appeals court determined the officer had hoisted the pants "presumably to conceal rather than to reveal."
Related listings
-
Microsoft Scores Court Victory Against Waledac Botnet
Legal News Center 09/10/2010A federal judge has brought Microsoft one step closer to seizing control of 276 domains controlled by the Waledac botnet.A magistrate judge in the U.S. District Court of Eastern Virginia decided Sept. 3 to recommend that a default judgment be granted...
-
Texas warden was last voice heard by 140 inmates
Legal News Center 08/31/2010The voice of Charles Thomas O'Reilly is the last one about 140 people Texas death row inmates have heard over the past six years.O'Reilly has been the warden of the state prison simply called the Huntsville Unit, where he presided over more lethal in...
-
The McCourts go to court with L.A. Dodgers future at question
Legal News Center 08/30/2010Divorces are as common as plastic surgery in Hollywood, but the divorce trial between Frank and Jamie McCourt that begins Monday has a chance to be the most titillating drama in this city since Lindsay Lohan's late-night capers. This trial could dete...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.