NY Beggars Granted Class Action Status
Legal News Center
A U.S. District Court Judge dismissed on Wednesday the arguments by New York City lawyers and granted six panhandlers to proceed with a class action against the state and local law-enforcement agencies accused of making thousands of illegal arrests under a defunct law.
Class action status means thousands of state's panhandlers with a similar complaint can join the suit and could be included in any monetary judgment.
Judge Shira Scheindlin said that granting class action status was the only way to stop the state-wide enforcement of an anti-begging law that was ruled unconstitutional in 1992, but since then has been used in over 10,000 arrests and prosecutions across the entire state.
"We're looking forward to putting an end to this practice," said Matthew Brinckerhoff, the beggars' lawyer.
The city lawyers had contended that the plaintiffs were unfit to represent such a large group in a class action suit, due to mental illness and drug addiction.
Related listings
-
Levy admits diverting $7 million from fund
Legal News Center 07/25/2007[##_1L|1209932041.jpg|width="180" height="128" alt=""|_##]A partner in a San Diego hedge fund that allegedly bilked investors out of up to $60 million pleaded guilty in federal court yesterday to tax evasion and conspiracy to commit mail fraud. Paul ...
-
Court: Judges Need All Detainee Evidence
Legal News Center 07/20/2007[##_1L|1254227088.jpg|width="120" height="84" alt=""|_##]When Guantanamo Bay detainees challenge their status as "enemy combatants," judges must review all the evidence, not just what the military chooses, a federal appeals court ruled Friday. The U....
-
SEC tackles muni bond regulation
Legal News Center 07/19/2007[##_1L|1023466887.jpg|width="130" height="128" alt=""|_##]Christopher Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, on Wednesday addressed a yawning gap in regulation of the $2,400bn US municipal bond market by calling for laws to broaden ...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.