Stevens: No White House oath needed for justices

Legal News Center

Justice John Paul Stevens says future Supreme Court justices shouldn't take their oath of office at the White House.


Supreme Court justices take two oaths before assuming the bench. In recent years, several justices took one of the oaths at the White House with the president in attendance.

Stevens, who is the oldest sitting justice, called that "inappropriate symbolism." Justices are supposed to be independent of politics and the White House.

He says that is why he refuses to attend Supreme Court ceremonies at the White House. He called on future nominees and future presidents to end the modern practice of having taking one of oaths done at the White House.

Related listings

  • Hawaii takes land dispute to Supreme Court

    Hawaii takes land dispute to Supreme Court

    Legal News Center 02/26/2009

    The U.S. Supreme Court is to hear arguments that will determine whether the state of Hawaii has to reach a political settlement with native Hawaiians before it can sell or transfer up to 1.2 million acres of valuable property. The state is arguing th...

  • Court rejects appeal from convicted Daley aides

    Court rejects appeal from convicted Daley aides

    Legal News Center 02/23/2009

    WASHINGTON - Mayor Richard M. Daley's former patronage chief and two other former city officials have failed to persuade the Supreme Court to consider setting aside their fraud convictions. The justices, in an order Monday, are letting stand Robert S...

  • Nevada Supreme Court suspends Las Vegas lawyer

    Nevada Supreme Court suspends Las Vegas lawyer

    Legal News Center 02/20/2009

    A Las Vegas attorney who stole nearly $400,000 from clients to support his gambling addiction has been suspended by the Nevada Supreme Court. The court rejected a recommendation to disbar Douglas Crawford. Crawford admitted to 65 professional conduct...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC

A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party

Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party

However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.

Business News

New York & New Jersey Family Law Matters We represent our clients in all types of proceedings that include termination of parental rights. >> read