Supreme Court Ruling Splits Anti-abortionists
Legal News Center
[##_1L|1117273147.jpg|width="131" height="91" alt=""|_##]A supreme court decision on abortion widely seen as the most important legal victory for the religious right in years has opened up a rift within the anti-abortion movement. In a full-page advertisement in a Colorado newspaper yesterday, the leaders of four anti-abortion groups accused a powerful evangelical leader of misleading his fellow Christians on the court verdict. The unusual attack on James Dobson, the founder of Focus on Family and arguably one of the most powerful figures on the religious right, comes only days after the death of the Rev Jerry Falwell, a leading conservative.
The breach prompted immediate speculation about cracks in what has until now been a remarkably united movement.
In their ad, the leaders of the four anti-abortion groups say Mr Dobson was wrong to see last April's supreme court decision as a victory. The verdict banned a particular procedure for terminations later in pregnancy, which the anti-abortion movement has labeled "partial birth abortions".
The campaign against that particular procedure has been a rallying point in the anti-abortion movement. Last month's decision was also seen as an indication of a shift to the right on the supreme court following two appointments by President Bush. Opponents of abortion now believe it could soon be possible to overturn the decision legalizing abortion.
However, yesterday's ad argues that the ban on late abortions will not reduce terminations. Instead, the ad says the ban will simply encourage doctors to find other methods for such terminations.
"Dr Dobson, you mislead Christians claiming this ruling will 'protect children.' The court granted no authority to save the life of even a single child," the ad said. It also called on Mr Dobson to repent.
Related listings
-
Supreme Court Takes Municipal Bond Case
Legal News Center 05/22/2007[##_1L|1395414137.jpg|width="131" height="91" alt=""|_##]The Supreme Court Monday said it will consider a case that could have big implications for the $3 trillion municipal bond market. The issue is whether states can exempt their muni bonds from ta...
-
N.C. Court of Appeals Hears Lottery Lawsuit
Legal News Center 05/21/2007[##_1L|1285254922.jpg|width="130" height="92" alt=""|_##]Is the North Carolina Education Lottery a tax, and was the law making it legal in the Tar Heel state passed unconstitutionally? State Superior Court Judge Henry Hight, in March 2006, ruled agai...
-
CA Supreme Court turns down stem cell research case
Legal News Center 05/18/2007[##_1L|1160712464.jpg|width="131" height="91" alt=""|_##]The California Supreme Court denied review of a lower court ruling Wednesday, effectively allowing the continuation of a state-sponsored program for stem cell research operated by the Californi...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.