Medvedev: Let court rule on Khodorkovsky, not us
Legal World
President Dmitry Medvedev urged officials on Friday to refrain from commenting on the case of jailed oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky before the court rules — his latest effort to try to improve the rule of law in Russia.
Medvedev's comments came only a week after Prime Minister Vladimir Putin compared Khodorkovsky, once Russia's richest man, to the U.S. disgraced financier Bernard Madoff who cheated investors out of an estimated $20 billion through a Ponzi fraud. Putin said Khodorkovsky deserves no leniency — a statement widely denounced as interfering in the trial.
"Neither the president nor any other state official has the right to comment on this particular case before the verdict is passed," Medvedev said in a live interview with Russia's state TV stations.
Khodorkovsky was convicted of underpaying taxes on the profits from his Yukos oil company and is serving an eight-year sentence. His case has been widely seen as punishment for daring to challenge the Kremlin's political and economic power during Putin's presidency, in part by funding opposition parties in parliament.
Khodorkovsky is now facing a second trial on charges of embezzling $25 billion worth of oil. A judge is to begin delivering the long-awaited verdict on that case Monday.
Medvedev, who has promised to establish independent courts and strengthen the rule of law in Russia, insisted that he saw no evidence to support claims that prosecutors were selective in applying the law and punishing the tycoon for common business practices.
Related listings
-
Top UK judge: No ban on Twitter in court
Legal World 12/20/2010The head of the judiciary in England and Wales ruled Monday that there is no ban on using Twitter in court.Lord Chief Justice Igor Judge said the use of "unobtrusive, hand held, virtually silent" equipment to give live text updates was unlikely to in...
-
Conviction of disgraced SKorean scientist upheld
Legal World 12/16/2010An appeals court ruled Thursday to uphold most of the fraud convictions against a South Korean scientist disgraced in a cloning scandal that shook the international scientific community.Hwang Woo-suk — who gained worldwide fame in 2004 with claims to...
-
Court rejects el-Masri suit against German gov't
Legal World 12/12/2010A German court rejected a lawsuit filed by Khaled el-Masri seeking to force Berlin into prosecuting suspected CIA agents who he alleges illegally detained him nearly eight years ago as part of the U.S. rendition program.The Cologne Administrative Cou...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.