U.S. court bars Vioxx lawsuits from Britain
Legal World
[##_1L|1021426973.jpg|width="120" height="101" alt=""|_##]An appellate court on Tuesday ruled that 98 people from the England and Wales cannot sue Merck & Co. in New Jersey for health claims arising from their use of the once-popular painkiller Vioxx. The New Jersey three-judge panel affirmed the decision of the state judge who is handling all of the more than 15,000 such lawsuits filed against the drug maker, which is based in New Jersey. The ruling is a victory for Merck, which maintains that the New Jersey court was an improper forum for foreign plaintiffs.
A lawyer for the British plaintiffs, Michael A. Galpern, said they will be considering whether to appeal to the New Jersey Supreme Court.
"We believe today's decision took an unrealistic view of English Law, and entirely disregarded the plain fact that the United Kingdom's loser pays system means that pensioners must now run the risk that Merck may take their house if they lose this case," Galpern said.
He said it was ironic that Merck said New Jersey was an inconvenient location to defend itself.
"The effect of today's ruling will be to make it much cheaper and easier for American companies to injure and kill non-U.S. residents," Galpern said.
Merck lawyer Charles W. Cohen applauded the ruling, asserting that the lawsuits should be filed in Britain, where the plaintiff's medical records and witnesses are located.
He noted that a similar finding was reached last year by the judge handling all the federal lawsuits, who dismissed lawsuits from residents of France and Italy.
Merck pulled Vioxx from the market in 2004 after research showed it doubled cardiovascular risks. The number of pending personal injury lawsuits against Merck have declined recently, to about 26,950, as some claims were dismissed. The company maintains it will not change its strategy of fighting each lawsuit.
Cases filed in New Jersey are all being handled by one judge, state Superior Court Judge Carol Higbee in Atlantic City.
Cases filed in various federal courts have been sent to New Orleans, where they are before U.S. District Judge Eldon E. Fallon.
Merck has won nine cases and lost five that have reached verdicts; it is appealing all its losses and faces retrials involving three other plaintiffs.
Related listings
-
Man Extradited from India Due in Court Today
Legal World 07/30/2007A delivery driver extradited from India is due in court charged with the kidnap, rape and murder of Southampton teenager Hannah Foster. Hannah, 17, was killed as she walked home from a night out in the city with friends in March 2003. Her strangled b...
-
Mulroney Vows To Fight Court Ruling
Legal World 07/27/2007Brian Mulroney has filed a motion to set aside a court ruling ordering him to pay $470,000 to former business associate Karlheinz Schreiber.The ruling, which caught Mulroney's lawyers off guard, came Thursday in a default judgment by the Ontario Supe...
-
Court: Russia to Pay Chechens
Legal World 07/27/2007The European Court of Human Rights ordered the Russian government to pay damages of $196,000 to the family members of 11 Chechen civilians killed by Russian soldiers in 2000. The court, in a Thursday ruling, suggested that by not bringing the soldier...

Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.