DOJ expands investigation into politicized decisions
Legal News Center
The US Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility has expanded its investigation into whether department aides illegally made hiring decisions based on consideration of applicants' political beliefs, the Los Angeles Times reported Thursday. The move follows Wednesday's testimony to the House Judiciary Committee by former DOJ aide Monica Goodling, where she admitted making hiring decisions based on political party affiliation. The DOJ also said that it found no evidence to support Goodling's claim that the practice was approved by officials in the department.
Goodling was testifying about her role in the firings of eight US Attorneys. She disputed testimony by resigning Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty, and claimed that at least one US Attorney was fired to open a spot for a protege of Karl Rove.
Related listings
-
Supreme Court Ruling Splits Anti-abortionists
Legal News Center 05/24/2007[##_1L|1117273147.jpg|width="131" height="91" alt=""|_##]A supreme court decision on abortion widely seen as the most important legal victory for the religious right in years has opened up a rift within the anti-abortion movement. In a full-page adve...
-
Supreme Court Takes Municipal Bond Case
Legal News Center 05/22/2007[##_1L|1395414137.jpg|width="131" height="91" alt=""|_##]The Supreme Court Monday said it will consider a case that could have big implications for the $3 trillion municipal bond market. The issue is whether states can exempt their muni bonds from ta...
-
N.C. Court of Appeals Hears Lottery Lawsuit
Legal News Center 05/21/2007[##_1L|1285254922.jpg|width="130" height="92" alt=""|_##]Is the North Carolina Education Lottery a tax, and was the law making it legal in the Tar Heel state passed unconstitutionally? State Superior Court Judge Henry Hight, in March 2006, ruled agai...
Grounds for Divorce in Ohio - Sylkatis Law, LLC
A divorce in Ohio is filed when there is typically “fault” by one of the parties and party not at “fault” seeks to end the marriage. A court in Ohio may grant a divorce for the following reasons:
• Willful absence of the adverse party for one year
• Adultery
• Extreme cruelty
• Fraudulent contract
• Any gross neglect of duty
• Habitual drunkenness
• Imprisonment in a correctional institution at the time of filing the complaint
• Procurement of a divorce outside this state by the other party
Additionally, there are two “no-fault” basis for which a court may grant a divorce:
• When the parties have, without interruption for one year, lived separate and apart without cohabitation
• Incompatibility, unless denied by either party
However, whether or not the the court grants the divorce for “fault” or not, in Ohio the party not at “fault” will not get a bigger slice of the marital property.